Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:29 PM
 
5,104 posts, read 2,050,159 times
Reputation: 2319

Advertisements

The closing of the Hamtramck plant revive some old wounds about Poletown from what I read on the Detroit Free Press.
https://www.freep.com/story/money/bu...ng/2114067002/

Quote:
GM's Hamtramck plant closing reopens old controversy in Detroit

Maybe the naysayers were right all along.

General Motors' decision to close its Hamtramck assembly plant recalls one of the most bitter development controversies in Michigan's history. Closing the plant will no doubt open old wounds — and raise anew questions of who benefits from such massive urban revitalization projects like the Hamtramck plant.

First, some history. By the early 1980s, then-Mayor Coleman Young was seeking to create jobs for economically distressed Detroit. He agreed to support General Motors’ plan to build its new assembly plant on the border of Detroit and Hamtramck.

But the more than 300-acre site was home to a Polish neighborhood known as Poletown. It featured about 4,000 residents, more than 1,000 houses, several Catholic churches and more than 100 businesses

 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:30 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverkris View Post
Maybe "bad forecasting" isn't really the case here. Ford is responding to a market trend proactively (fewer passenger cars), and so are other motor vehicle manufacturers. Even VW has dropped its Passat sedan here (produced in Tennessee).
Yeah, the vehicle market is changing for ALL manufacturers.
Not a lot of reason to single out GM.

Ken
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:31 PM
 
736 posts, read 456,269 times
Reputation: 2414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
Both Ohio and Michigan voted for Trump. That decision sure is coming back to bite them. What happened to his promises to restore factory jobs?
I'm sure this will be the biggestist bestesses most wonderfulist lay-offs ever seen.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:32 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,522,497 times
Reputation: 14945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
People want large SUV's, and pick up trucks now, not sedans, or EV's. The company is just responding to the market. Plants close, plants open. That's the business world.
There's a fairly new commercial about the Mercedes Sprinter van, touting the 'configurability' and that it will be built in South Carolina.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:32 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,732 posts, read 18,809,520 times
Reputation: 22579
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Apparently Ford cars aren't selling either. Actually I the date wrong, it was not announced last month, it was back in April. The only "cars" it's going to offer are the Mustang and the upcoming Ford Focus Active. Everything else will be an SUV or a truck.

https://money.cnn.com/2018/04/25/aut...ica/index.html

Ken
Great. More piece-of-crap goliath trucks hogging the road, belching smokescreens into the atmosphere. Just what we need.

What we need are more small cars and more people with enough brains to understand the advantages.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Lee County, NC
3,318 posts, read 2,338,964 times
Reputation: 4382
So, they're getting rid of cars that aren't selling and firing the workers who built said cars. I don't see the issue. It happens all the time in many industries.

It sucks that those people will be out of a job, but with the current red-hot job market, they should be able to find work elsewhere.

Maybe Trump can also talk GM into bringing some of the vehicles they build overseas back here to fill those factories. The CEO of GM is supposedly going to The White House to have a meeting with Kudlow tomorrow.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,231,444 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Apparently Ford had bad forecasting too. It announced just a month or so ago that it was dropping all but 2 of it's cars.

Ken
Ford has been laying off around the world. They will layoff in the US soon as the cost of tariffs and high interest rates from Trump policy cut their sales even further than they already have.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:37 PM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,496,850 times
Reputation: 2963
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
GM did warn that they are out $1 billion because of tariffs months ago. Other companies like Target have also issued warnings. Trump isn't good for America. We are more divided than ever. Companies are starting to feel the effects of his economic policies. We will be in recession late next year or going into 2020.
Because they wish to continue sourcing goods made in china.
Why would they upset investors and unions, and take the payouts and profit sharing, and put that money to do 100% onshore manufacturing.

Harley, same thing. They came about 10 years too late with their new models. They are pumping out bikes that appeal to millennials now. They ignored an entire generation by focusing on catering to literally, a dying market, in the form of pumping out geezer glides with an asinine price tag.

The word is Complacency.

Corporatists don't want to spend the money if they can hoard it. They've grown complacent and don't want to change while the getting is good.

GMs issue has been poor upper management, and hideous body styles. Look at how they ruined Cadillac for example.
I never bought a car from them beyond Devilles, Eldorados, Fleetwood/Fleetwood Broughams, other folks buy their cars and complain about stupid little things like "interior feels cheap" etc etc

I always bought Chevy pickups. Until manufacturers stop appeasing the cookie cutter market and pump out V8 Rearwheel drive manual transmission cars. I'm not buying. Pickups it is. Until the 2019s came out. Well. Just may wind up buying a Hell Cat Challenger afterall.
I buy trucks because they're rear wheel drive. V8. And I use trucks for truck stuff.
Can't really put a dirt bike in a civic.

I'd rather spend 50k and build a custom 60s-80s C10 than buy a brand new hideous 2019. That thing is FUGLY.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,046,690 times
Reputation: 22091
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Not crap cars... but cars that are not in demand.

It was GMs bad forecasting. People don't want sedans right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Apparently Ford had bad forecasting too. It announced just a month or so ago that it was dropping all but 2 of it's cars.

Ken
Just like an ocean liner, these companies cannot change direction on a dime.

Considering the fluidity of the car market at this time in history, the future availability of fossil fuels, climate change and pollution, global markets, the public's wants and needs, advances in technology.....I would hate to try to predict what kind of vehicle will be popular 5-10 years from now.....and that is what automakers are faced with right now.

There are many pieces to the puzzle and no easy answers.
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Just like an ocean liner, these companies cannot change direction on a dime.

Considering the fluidity of the car market at this time in history, the future availability of fossil fuels, climate change and pollution, global markets, the public's wants and needs, advances in technology.....I would hate to try to predict what kind of vehicle will be popular 5-10 years from now.....and that is what automakers are faced with right now.

There are many pieces to the puzzle and no easy answers.
I doubt very much the TRUE availability of fossil fuels will be a real concern. However, it is government's mandate of going electric that is the concern. So, you're right that is a big wild card right now. People want big Trucks, and SUV's, more, and more governments want us on mass transit, or in EV's. There is a HUGE disconnect between what the Market wants, and what cities, and some states want. There will eventually be a clash.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top