Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The new conspircy theory that Manafort was meeting with Assange pretty much says the Stone/Corsi conspircy theory is dead.
How does Manafort meeting with Assange negate the claim that Stone and Corsi were coordinating with Assange? If anything, it probably makes the latter claim more likely as Stone and Corsi's coordination with Assange was likely also coordinated with the Trump campaign, perhaps through Manafort.
Quote:
Mueller just cut Manafort loose, it seems his last ditch attempt to get Manafort to say Trump colluded has failed.
Manafort is likely going to jail for the rest of his natural life, so he is hardly getting "cut loose." There are competing theories about what Manafort lied about and what broader implications theree are, but one thing is for certain - Mueller is not going to ask District Judge Berman-Jackson to drop the hammer on Manafort because he was unable to provide Mueller with information damaging to Trump. Mueller's supporting memorandum will have to show that Manafort lied about (or intentionally omitted) numerous material things and Mueller will also have to present evidence to support his claim. In other words, "we thought Manafort would give us information on Trump but he had nothing to give" is not going to cut it. Thus, we can assume that your premise that Mueller "cut Manafort loose" because he had nothing on Trump to give Mueller is not an accurate conclusion.
I give you points for trying to put lipstick on a pig here like a good little sycophantic cultist, but make no mistake; this is not good news for Trump.
Some pretty strong Kool aid you're drinking there chief.
There is no evidence that Stone, or Corsi did anything illegal with Assange/Wikileaks.
That conspircy theory seems to be dying, so a new conspircy theory is now needed, and presto, just like magic, we have a brand new shiny conspircy theory.
There is no evidence that Stone, or Corsi did anything illegal with Assange/Wikileaks.
That conspircy theory seems to be dying, so a new conspircy theory is now needed, and presto, just like magic, we have a brand new shiny conspircy theory.
Funny how that works.
Tell that to Corsi and Stone, who have both publicly stated that they expect to be indicted shortly.
Nothing says "I didn't do anything illegal" like "I think getting indicted for what I did" right?
Get a grip, KoolAid man. The Corsi/Stone charges are the furthest thing from dying, as acknowledged by Corsi and Stone themselves.
Notice that every claim in the article is attributed to a "source" and then conclusions are built around each claim as if they were true. Even when they admit he was never in the embassy, the "source" shows up again to claim that he never logged in.
Notice that every claim in the article is attributed to a "source" and then conclusions are built around each claim as if they were true. Even when they admit he was never in the embassy, the "source" shows up again to claim that he never logged in.
Maybe you glossed over this little tidbit from the article.
Quote:
A separate internal document written by Ecuador’s Senain intelligence agency and seen by the Guardian lists “Paul Manaford [sic]” as one of several well-known guests. It also mentions “Russians”.
So Ecuador releases visitors' logs that show Manafort met several times with Assange. Once while he was Trump's campaign manager.
This ties Trump's campaign manager to Assange's Russian-backed efforts to manipulate the election. The plot thickens but it's pretty easy to see who's in the stew here.
What campaign manager plots to rig an election without having the candidate on board?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.