Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who is more corrupt: Clinton or Nixon?
Clinton 42 43.75%
Nixon 54 56.25%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2018, 06:07 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,624,120 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

Remember Seth Rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2018, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,959 posts, read 75,183,468 times
Reputation: 66916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Nixon: impeached and resigned after the Senate told him they had the votes to convict.
Technically, Nixon wasn't impeached. The House Judiciary Committee voted to present three articles of impeachment to the full House, but Nixon resigned before the House could vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 07:06 PM
 
21,929 posts, read 9,498,367 times
Reputation: 19454
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
Again, history will tell. I will say that Hillary Clinton, within 6 months of being First Lady, had the Travelgate scandal. For those who don't recall, she tried to oust the longtime white house travel office director by siccing the FBI and IRS on him. She wanted to replace him with a couple of her cronies. The guy was acquitted quickly of all charges by a jury.

So she tried to ruin a man's life and put him behind bars in order to get a patronage slot. I have to admit I am not an authority on Nixon, having never even read a biography of him, but as far as I know he never did anything quite that heinous.
Don't forget how she turned $1000 into $100k in cattle futures. Ask any investor how likely THAT is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 03:19 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Yes. End of story. Trump supporters are delusional. FBI said they found nothing on Hillary. FBI said they found MANY things on Nixon and his administration. Hillary has never been president. Nixon was president. See the difference?

Yeah, but then we found a bunch of **** on her friends at the FBI!

The only reason any of us know about Strzok, Page, Baker, McCabe, Ohr, Ohr, Halper, Misfud, Brennan, Clapper, Rice, et. al., is because Trump won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 03:22 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
It's not a lie. Of course, they found emails but they could not prove what? Intent

Therefore you are not the judge or FBI. The investigation was concluded therefore she did nothing wrong according to our legal system, not based on your opinion. Therefore what I said stands. Hillary did nothing wrong legally.


The inspector general found “no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations.†The report acknowledged that certain emails appeared to contain classified information, but investigators determined the FBI’s conclusion that Clinton did not intend to expose classified information was legitimate. …

Section f of the Espionage Act doesn't require intent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 01:24 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,293,305 times
Reputation: 7284
How could I ever doubt the legal chops of an Internet forum legal expert?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,894,142 times
Reputation: 14125
Nixon was all but confirmed, Clinton is just innuendo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,010,275 times
Reputation: 2167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Don't forget how she turned $1000 into $100k in cattle futures. Ask any investor how likely THAT is.
Yes, all of the Arkansas era scandals surrounding the Clintons were Hillary's babies--cattlegate, whitewater, the McDougals, etc. At that time Bill was only interested in politics and skirts. He didn't care about money. The only scandal Bill was responsible for was 'troopergate,' where Bill was using state troopers to procure female friends, and using troopers to drive him back and forth to trysts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,010,275 times
Reputation: 2167
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Nixon was all but confirmed, Clinton is just innuendo.
travelgate has been pretty well documented. After all, there was a court case about it. There have been several books that covered it. Blood Sport by NYT finance writer James Stewart is a good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,894,142 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
travelgate has been pretty well documented. After all, there was a court case about it. There have been several books that covered it. Blood Sport by NYT finance writer James Stewart is a good one.
Travelgate, Troopergate and Whitewater are real, but the issue is they could never truly tie Clinton to them. Well, enough in a way they would be impeachable and instead resorted to a tryst with Monica. Nixon on the otherhand, was hands on in Watergate and its cover-up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top