Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:16 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by animalcrazy View Post
No actually coalman is right. There were 15 convictions associated with Whitewater. The McDougals (the Clinton friends and business partners) were convicted of fraud. Clinton's successor as governor of Arkansas and Hillary's law partner Hubbell who also served in Clinton's Justice Department pleaded guilty to fraud charges. Now here's the kicker. Ken Starr found no criminal liability with the Clinton's and said that the Clinton's were most likely victims of Jim McDougals malfeasance than that they were co-conspirators. Source Vox Whitewater, explained for people who don't remember the Clinton presidency.


So either the Clinton's are super good and slippery as haters would want to believe, or, they didn't do anything wrong, and they have never been convicted of any wrong doing. It's not that the Republican's didn't try, they tried hard and only came up with one blue dress.
Actually it's more like:

A) Either the Clintons are the most brilliant criminal masterminds of all time - wayyyyyyy smarter than any Republicans
or
B) The Republicans who have been trying to pin something (ANYTHING) on the Clintons for the last 30 years are the most clueless, incompetent bozos since Inspector Clouseau
or
C) The Clintons didn't do any of the things the GOP claims.
or
D) A combination of A) and B) or B) and C) - either way, THIS option ALWAYS includes B.

Ken

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,848,920 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
I don't mean to burst your bubble, but don't get your "hopes" in a wad over anything Judge Eddie Munster Napolatano says in judgement of his good good friend President Donald J Trump.



FOX News also pays Juan Williams, Sheppard Smith, Harf, and that little nasal faced girl running around with Jessie Waters, etc. Doesn't mean the guy ain't an Orange Man Bad hack.
And? So? You didn't say anything of substance. All your post did was call people names.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
She won`t need to go back to her nude modeling gig.
Will the Donald start a nude modeling gig?

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:21 PM
 
6,620 posts, read 5,005,482 times
Reputation: 3688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
Lets assume for the sake of argument that a state case could be filed against Trump for a payoff regarding a cover for an illicit affair/tryst with a woman for sex.
Lets also assume that Mueller farmed that to state officials via the same tactic he did to pressure Cohen to be coerced into making such a claim.

Is the liberal left in this country now so desperate to damage Trump politically (wouldn't rise to a legitimate impeachable crime according to liberal scholars like Dershowitz or Turley), that they would now embrace a government witch hunt( which their previous brethren would have abhorred).

Remember, it was not that long ago they were against the investigative agencies of the government as corrupt and trampling on the civil rights of citizens. They abhorred the FBI led by Hoover who spied on people like JFK via all his extramarital affairs, Bobby Kennedy and MLK for their shortcomings, etc. ?
Lets not forget the Alger Hiss type of examples of communist infiltration of our society, etc., etc. etc.

So while they would not freely admit hypocrisy, would they really want to try and remove a duly elected president of the opposite party/ideology, via these tactics of looking for something serious (i.e. Russian collusion), but willing to try and harm/remove him for some political crime at best?

`
The 90's were 30 years ago, the 60's were a couple of generations back, what do you mean not long ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,848,920 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Actually it's more like:

A) Either the Clintons are the most brilliant criminal masterminds of all time - wayyyyyyy smarter than any Republicans
or
B) The Republicans who have been trying to pin something (ANYTHING) on the Clintons for the last 30 years are the most clueless, incompetent bozos since Inspector Clouseau
or
C) The Clintons didn't do any of the things the GOP claims.
or
D) A combination of A) and B) or B) and C) - either way, THIS option ALWAYS includes B.

Ken

D) Too big to jail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:21 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Well, except that he is actually winning.
Yeah, he's winning him some deep digging into his illicit activities, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:23 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT View Post
The 90's were 30 years ago, the 60's were a couple of generations back, what do you mean not long ago?
Most Donald supporters are in their dotage - ie their Alzheimer years.
THAT explains a LOT.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:27 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,552 posts, read 17,251,719 times
Reputation: 37264
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Yeah, he's winning him some deep digging into his illicit activities, lol.
If he's done something illegal, then charge him.
Finding out that Cohen has engaged in income tax evasion, bank fraud and lying under oath does not implicate Trump.
All the Lefties can do it play the song from "My Fair Lady" ........... Just You Wait
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...8A11&FORM=VIRE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:33 PM
 
26,562 posts, read 14,432,756 times
Reputation: 7421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Finding out that Cohen has engaged in income tax evasion, bank fraud and lying under oath does not implicate Trump.

correct, but you left out one, felony campaign finance violation, of which trump is directly implicated by cohen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 12:48 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,465,198 times
Reputation: 9430
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Actually it's more like:

A) Either the Clintons are the most brilliant criminal masterminds of all time - wayyyyyyy smarter than any Republicans
or
B) The Republicans who have been trying to pin something (ANYTHING) on the Clintons for the last 30 years are the most clueless, incompetent bozos since Inspector Clouseau
or
C) The Clintons didn't do any of the things the GOP claims.
or
D) A combination of A) and B) or B) and C) - either way, THIS option ALWAYS includes B.

Ken

C. Doing something illegal to enable themselves to lose 40K doesn`t make sense to a normal person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top