Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:02 AM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 28 days ago)
 
27,647 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19069

Advertisements

White man has feathered the nest and offered the reigns to any that are willing. It has been a precipitous journey for the underlings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:02 AM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,258,444 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll View Post
Is it “worried,” or is it simply interested in having more diverse representation?
The latter. That's how I read it.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:05 AM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,258,444 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The dems have been pushing this notion for years, that only a woman should be elected to represent women. As if when writing tax laws and such, only a woman can possibly write laws to govern other women. They do the same with race. It's racist and sexist to think only a, black woman can write laws for other black women. It's a destructive idea and it splits people into different groups, as it eats away at the fabric of American society.


They think it's a winning platform to Bulkanize the nation into disparate groups, setting people up as either a victim or an oppressor. With the democrat politicians setting themselves up as the only people on earth who can protect us all, and keep the barbarians at the gate.
Both parties have run on a platform, since the beginning of both parties, that only white guys who owned land and were wealthy should be in office.

Show me where I'm wrong about that, historically. Nobody complained about it much until recently and I have never seen any white guys upset about it because.... wait.... people like them run the country.

LOL. It's funny that so many people do not see this.

I have no issue with white guys in office. I have voted for a lot of them. But, white guys often (not always, but often) do not see what's wrong with them expecting people who are not white and male to be PROPORTIONATELY better than a white guy to get elected.

It works the same way in business, btw.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:06 AM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,258,444 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
White man has feathered the nest and offered the reigns to any that are willing. It has been a precipitous journey for the underlings.
Where did you read that nonsense?
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
and because of that, Kirsten g's head is assploding
Based on her comments she prefers more diversity, not removal of the white men. But then again, that is her take on it, and you are free to disagree. I think they need to put forth the best possible candidate. Beto and Gillum might be a good pair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,772 posts, read 3,223,143 times
Reputation: 6110
That's ok. I'm not happy with Gillibrand either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:15 AM
 
3,221 posts, read 1,737,993 times
Reputation: 2197
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
White man has feathered the nest and offered the reigns to any that are willing. It has been a precipitous journey for the underlings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
Where did you read that nonsense?

I'll admit I laughed out loud. That is some hot, HOT garbage if I've ever seen it. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt, he's probably joking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
This paragraph illustrates exactly my thoughts on the subject.

I did tell someone a while back, and I stick to that, that the only way the Dems would likely take down Trump was with another white guy with a lot of name recognition.

Sad it works that way, because there are likely plenty of candidates who are qualified who are not both white and male.
Unfortunately Americans like to be entertained, which gave us Trump, while disqualifying better candidates like Rand Paul, and Marco Rubio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 09:01 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,507,037 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll View Post
Is it “worried,” or is it simply interested in having more diverse representation?
She was asked if she was worried that the diverse Democratic party has three white guys as leading contenders right now, and answered Yes. Though she then gave the obligatory diversity, inclusive, people of color spiel, she's worried that the D's won't win without a not-white male on the ticket. She has to be frustrated over upstart white guy Beno polling better than not-white guys whose names have been out there for a while, like her, Booker, Harris, Warren.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2018, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
And yet they are offering three white men

Which means nothing to this conversation. The dems are now, and have always been obsessed with race, skin color, and gender. Any woman Democrat who runs for office will insert into her campaign, that she's a woman, and infer how her gender makes her uniquely qualified for the job.


all you need to do is remember Sonia Sotomayor, and her "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."


Or just revisit the Hilary presidential campaign, where she made it all about her being a woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top