False rape accusations leading to few cases being closed

[Berteau]

Originally Posted by middle-aged mom

Maybe the US could adopt laws similar to that of long time US ally, Saudi Arabia and target the victims.

If the female violated gender segregation rules, she got what she deserved.

If there are no male witnesses, forget about it.

Ignore physical evidence.

Cancel the license of lawyers who choose to prosecute, especially when the alleged rapist is connected to or a member of the Royal Kindom.

Sounds like a plan to me.

You mean Saudi Arabia and every other Arab country. And I’m sure you were against trumps Muslim ban.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by mightleavenyc

Despite the liberal media devoting an entire article making up reasons police aren't closing rape cases, they fail to state the obvious that more and more rape cases are fake. The liberal narrative will tell you police should exhaust all their resources believing some woman despite no physical or corroborating evidence.

https://ktar.com/story/2372850/despi...nfound-police/

https://ktar.com/wp-content/uploads/...4f-620x370.jpg

You didn't even take the time to read your own article, the number of reported rapes is increasing partially because of a change in criteria but also more people are coming forward. Past history indicates many victims would not come forward as was the case in the Catholic Church.


So you go on believing your fantasy that more rape reports are fake, of course it couldn't possibly be that the police don't have the resources when reports doubled.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Berteau

You mean Saudi Arabia and every other Arab country. And I’m sure you were against trumps Muslim ban.

Saudi Arabia was never part of Trump's immigration ban, now why would we ban a country that was responsible for 9/11.

[Berteau]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Saudi Arabia was never part of Trump's immigration ban, now why would we ban a country that was responsible for 9/11.

The country wasn’t responsible. They weren’t sponsored by the country. They were resident of the country. That’s like saying all the countries ISIS is in and trying to take over has the support of the governments they are trying to overthrow.

Regardless, the more Muslim countries banned the better correct?

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Berteau

The country wasn’t responsible. They weren’t sponsored by the country. They were resident of the country. That’s like saying all the countries ISIS is in and trying to take over has the support of the governments they are trying to overthrow.

Regardless, the more Muslim countries banned the better correct?

A country that supports radical Madrassas has no culpability.

[SFit]

Originally Posted by Absolom

Apples and carrots, dude.

So thats what your head is filled with? You make a lot more sense now.

The OP is suggesting, without evidence, that rape cases that can't be closed are false rape claims. There isn't enough evidence to prove they are true are false, but the people who love to scream fake rape automatically use it as proof anyway.

If every time a person claiming they were being falsely accused of rape ended up having plenty of evidence to convict, it wouldn't make sense to write off everyone else who claims they were falsely accused as liars.

It should be simple. Women shouldn't be automatically believed when they claim rape, and men shouldn't be automatically believed when they claim the charges are false.

I made the mistake of going into the red pill male world when I was a an evangelical conservative and trying to take them seriously at the time. The fake rape crowd are a bunch of triggered, angry idiots who think women are plotting a world takeover with false rape claims. Great candidates for listening to Alex Jones claim NASA is running a child sex slave colony on Mars.