Hackers threaten to release 9/11 files (federal, world, documents, business)

[subaru5555]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

Kinetic energy is calculated by half the mass times the velocity squared. The important part in understanding this is the squared, the energy increases exponentially as the velocity increases.

Thanks. We don’t usually agree, but +1.

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by elvis44102

ok its mass time acceleration my slip up semantics has nothing to do with it


and i am supposing that you don't have the relevant knowledge as to which version hit the twin tower either and don't care enough to look it up

flight 175 was a Boeing 767–222
flight 11 was a Boeing 767-223ER


ER being extended range (more power and more fuel capacity and passenger)





Boeing 707-120 Specs

• Length: 144 ft, 6 in.
• Wingspan: 130 ft, 10 in.
• Max weight: 248,000 lbs.
• Cruise speed: 600 mph.
• Range: 3,000 mi.
• Passengers 185

Boeing 767-200ER series Specs

• Length: 159 ft 2 in .
• Wingspan: 156 ft 1 in / .
• Max weight: 395,000 lb .
• Cruise speed: 600+ mph.
• Range: 6,590 nmi / 12,200 km
• Fuel Capacity 24,140 USgal
• Passengers 290+

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/speed-l...se-25-02-2002/

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

Kinetic energy is calculated by half the mass times the velocity squared. The important part in understanding this is the squared, the energy increases exponentially as the velocity increases.

I just been cubing the speed of light . . . but it's a different field.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVQfWC_evg

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by subaru5555

Lawl, whatever you say. I get the feeling one of us knows absolutely nothing about physics.....


No, I just have no interest in playing word-games with a 9/11 truther.

I wont even call them truthers...they are twoofers

[elvis44102]

i am not going to argue with anyone on this forum as well all i can say is that it has been 17yrs since the 9/11 tragedy and nothing has changed there IS information out there but it is also polluted with lots and lots of bad information


no line of argument on this forum would dissuade either "side" from their deeply held beliefs


and yes jet fuel fires weaken or even melt steel in official government reality lol

[subaru5555]

Originally Posted by elvis44102

i am not going to argue with anyone on this forum as well all i can say is that it has been 17yrs since the 9/11 tragedy and nothing has changed there IS information out there but it is also polluted with lots and lots of bad information


no line of argument on this forum would dissuade either "side" from their deeply held beliefs


and yes jet fuel fires weaken or even melt steel in official government reality lol

There are no “sides” to take. There is reality, which will always exists despite objections to the contrary, and then there’s the willfully ignorant.

[elvis44102]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

flight 175 was a Boeing 767–222
flight 11 was a Boeing 767-223ER


ER being extended range (more power and more fuel capacity and passenger)





Boeing 707-120 Specs

• Length: 144 ft, 6 in.
• Wingspan: 130 ft, 10 in.
• Max weight: 248,000 lbs.
• Cruise speed: 600 mph.
• Range: 3,000 mi.
• Passengers 185

Boeing 767-200ER series Specs

• Length: 159 ft 2 in .
• Wingspan: 156 ft 1 in / .
• Max weight: 395,000 lb .
• Cruise speed: 600+ mph.
• Range: 6,590 nmi / 12,200 km
• Fuel Capacity 24,140 USgal
• Passengers 290+

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/speed-l...se-25-02-2002/

Boeing 707 - Specifications - Technical Data / Description


333,000 lbs

[elvis44102]

Originally Posted by subaru5555

There are no “sides” to take. There is reality, which will always exists despite objections to the contrary, and then there’s the willfully ignorant.

i sleep better at knowing you are being are guarding the "truth" maybe you could explain the domino theory and how all that "truth" worked out

[subaru5555]

Originally Posted by elvis44102

i sleep better at knowing you are being are guarding the "truth" maybe you could explain the domino theory and how all that "truth" worked out

Uhhhh....is that seriously your best retort?


I’m not “guarding” anything. The truth stands on its own, and no amount of skepticism or half-truths are going to change reality.

[elvis44102]

Originally Posted by subaru5555

Uhhhh....is that seriously your best retort?


I’m not “guarding” anything. The truth stands on its own, and no amount of skepticism or half-truths are going to change reality.

i am also after the truth and dont have my mind made up on any thing i am certainly not trying to insult people who just seek the truth