Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
RBG will either recover and return to the bench (actual physical presence) , or continue working from home. Either way, the rehearing of Knick v. Township of Scott is scheduled for January 16th. It's a 5th Amendment violation case: the taking of private property for public use without just compensation, in other words... zero compensation. Wonder if RBG will rule for the little guy (or gal in this case, the property owner), or side with the government bully statists.
Actually, I believe he will retire this year so another young originalist can be appointed.
Yeah, he’s an originalist alright.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry
Why don't you look up the reasons why? I get it, you nanny staters need protection from the state which is odd since the state is also protecting you at the same time with Miranda. Protect yourself from your own mouth, don't talk to police without a lawyer.
That's right, any black person you disagree with is carrying whiteys water.
I disagreed with my brother just yesterday. He’s not an Uncle Tom though.
Roe will not be overturned. However, I can see SCOTUS ruling that Medicaid (taxpayer funding) cannot be used to pay for abortion in the many states in which that currently happens. Want an abortion? Fund it yourself, or get a voluntary donor sponsor to pay for it.
There are no absolutes in life.
To be honest with yourself, you would have to accept who has the better argument, when in front of textualists, instead of activist.
There are no absolutes in life.
To be honest with yourself, you would have to accept who has the better argument, when in front of textualists, instead of activist.
A SCOTUS Justice who actually abides by their oath to support and defend the US Constitution would have to rule in favor of the First Amendment. Taxpayers, whether local, state, or federal, cannot be compelled by government to fund abortions via Medicaid if their religion forbids abortion.
A SCOTUS Justice who actually abides by their oath to support and defend the US Constitution would have to rule in favor of the First Amendment. Taxpayers, whether local, state, or federal, cannot be compelled by government to fund abortions via Medicaid if their religion forbids abortion.
....allegedly!
But you and I both know, it does not always work like that.
How many times have you snapped at a SC ruling?
Only you can consent to be governed by idiots.
Promised by the US Constitution, described by the Declaration of Independence, NO MAN is good enough to govern you without your consent.
Without your consent, all that government is authorized to do is secure endowed (sacred) rights (prosecute trespass; adjudicate disputes; defend against enemies, foreign or domestic).
Once you consent.... Sitdown, shut up, pay & obey, buddy!
Roe will not be overturned. However, I can see SCOTUS ruling that Medicaid (taxpayer funding) cannot be used to pay for abortion in the many states in which that currently happens. Want an abortion? Fund it yourself, or get a voluntary donor sponsor to pay for it.
Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as inalienable.
Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as inalienable.
Murder is evil.
Apparently, lefties have concluded that mothers can kill their fetuses, but no one else can. Hence, the multiple feticide laws throughout the US with their consequent prison terms upon conviction. That, in and of itself, is a violation of the Equal Protections Clause.
RBG will either recover and return to the bench (actual physical presence) , or continue working from home. Either way, the rehearing of Knick v. Township of Scott is scheduled for January 16th. It's a 5th Amendment violation case: the taking of private property for public use without just compensation, in other words... zero compensation. Wonder if RBG will rule for the little guy (or gal in this case, the property owner), or side with the government bully statists.
And all the people/landowners/ranchers/towns along the southern border pay close attention..
I was thinking the same. Didn't take long for the right to rat pack RBG.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
