Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When Democrats took control of the U.S. House as a result of last November’s election, many Republicans assumed, perhaps optimistically, the danger presented by this new liberal majority would come primarily from legislation passed thanks to their newly-acquired majority; legislation that would be blocked by either the Senate or the White House. Yet, for those like myself who have served in the House of Representatives and know the full force of the House is not necessarily in the legislation brought to the floor, but in the various committees that wield enormous power for the majority party, we warned that there would be consequences; in particular for the Second Amendment.
If republicans were the party of the second amendment, why didn’t we get concealed carry reciprocity & the hearing protection acts passed when they had full control of the congress and the White House?
Why did evil Barry allow bump-stocks & white-knight trump ban them?
Why did bush offer to sign an extension of the AWB?
If republicans were the party of the second amendment, why didn’t we get concealed carry reciprocity & the hearing protection acts passed when they had full control of the congress and the White House?
Why did evil Barry allow bump-stocks & white-knight trump ban them?
Why did bush offer to sign an extension of the AWB?
Why did Reagan-the-great sign the Brady bill?
Republicans aren’t friends of liberty.
When it comes to the Second Amendment, Republicans are FAR preferable to Democrats. There is no comparison, so please stop with the false equivalency.
The Supreme Court has been pretty consistent for over a century that the 2nd Amendment is not some absolute right. There are limits.
The battle is not about removing the 2nd Amendment at all, though the NRA would LOVE for you bots to continue to believe that. The political wrangling is about where the line is on what can be had, when and by whom. It is that simple.
Vague speculation in an opinion piece is proof that Democrats are readying a multi-pronged attack on the Second Amendment?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
