Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:12 AM
 
5,989 posts, read 6,786,737 times
Reputation: 18486

Advertisements

NYT has a paywall, but still accessible

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/u...gtype=Homepage

The proposed funding would go toward infrastructure at ports of entry and funding 75 new immigration judges, to speed up adjudication of asylum claims. This should go a long way toward dealing with the backlog at the border.

Trump saying he will make an announcement today - hopefully this will end the shutdown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,502 posts, read 17,250,696 times
Reputation: 35800
Well at least the Dems are starting to negotiate. Trump wants $5 they offer $1. Maybe they can meet in the middle somewhere?

At least they are negotiating and not vacationing in Afghanistan and Europe. Trump was right to stop Pelosis' flight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:22 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,231,255 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
Well at least the Dems are starting to negotiate. Trump wants $5 they offer $1. Maybe they can meet in the middle somewhere?

At least they are negotiating and not vacationing in Afghanistan and Europe. Trump was right to stop Pelosis' flight.

No, they are still offering $0 for a wall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,526,580 times
Reputation: 25774
Quote:
Originally Posted by parentologist View Post
NYT has a paywall, but still accessible

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/u...gtype=Homepage

The proposed funding would go toward infrastructure at ports of entry and funding 75 new immigration judges, to speed up adjudication of asylum claims. This should go a long way toward dealing with the backlog at the border.

Trump saying he will make an announcement today - hopefully this will end the shutdown.
So...instead of securing the border and protecting Americans, Dems want to put in an express lane for those that want to come here? Sad and pathetic that Democrats put everyone ahead of American citizens.

In a way though I hope they keep it up. In 2020 the new Communist party will be irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Haiku
7,132 posts, read 4,772,153 times
Reputation: 10327
Well, I for one am hoping Trump bends a little in his offer today, despite saying he wouldn't, and I hope Pelosi does the same and accepts it. I think the wall is dumb but this shutdown is not worth the damage it is causing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,511,604 times
Reputation: 13259
Democrats want only porous solutions that can be reversed the moment the next Dem POTUS takes office. That’s the bottom line. A wall is too permanent of a solution to something they don’t even see as a problem in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:10 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,970,933 times
Reputation: 33185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So...instead of securing the border and protecting Americans, Dems want to put in an express lane for those that want to come here? Sad and pathetic that Democrats put everyone ahead of American citizens.

In a way though I hope they keep it up. In 2020 the new Communist party will be irrelevant.
Good grief. According to CNN, "The money includes port security measures as well funding for immigration judges who could help with cases of migrants crossing the US-Mexico border seeking asylum, the source told CNN." Just because Trump doesn't get his honorary wall doesn't mean he won't get more border security. And do you know what a judge is and what the judicial system does? A judge can rule in favor or against a party, meaning, they can choose to approve or deny asylum. Thus, more judges means more people will be put through the system faster, making it more efficient and improving border security. There are many ways to approach any problem.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/19/polit...ump/index.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:14 AM
 
3,105 posts, read 3,836,099 times
Reputation: 4066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So...instead of securing the border and protecting Americans, Dems want to put in an express lane for those that want to come here?

They are nothing but traitors. Dems represent Mexico, not America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:20 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,612,875 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
No, they are still offering $0 for a wall.
In negotiations, BOTH sides usually give in a little, compromise, etc. sounds like the shutdown is nowhere close to being resolved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:29 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,231,255 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So...instead of securing the border and protecting Americans, Dems want to put in an express lane for those that want to come here? Sad and pathetic that Democrats put everyone ahead of American citizens.

In a way though I hope they keep it up. In 2020 the new Communist party will be irrelevant.

No, this would be good. Very good. It may be the best thing Dems have offered yet.


We need more judges to resolve asylum cases within three weeks, as Ted Cruz proposed in a bill last June (flat out rejected by Democrats). Because 90% of asylum cases have been denied (will probably be higher in these latest waves) and courts have ruled we can't deport them until resolved (and not enough beds in detention centers to hold them two years). If we can adjudicate cases within three weeks, we can deport 90% of them prior to having to release them into America.



Take your pick. A) 1000 come to border and ask asylum, they stay in detention a few weeks, case is backlogged two years, 1000 get released into America, 100 show up in court later, 900 disappear into the woodwork. B) 1000 come to border and ask asylum, they stay in detention a few weeks, case is resolved in three weeks, 900 get deported, 100 get released into America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top