Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You did, but I further defined the actual the harm because it has to be done. Picking one side and condemning the other is not enough in this case.
I guess I didn't make myself very clear. Picking one side and condemning the other (in most cases, at least initially, the kids) is what got us here in the first place. That is what I meant.
I guess I didn't make myself very clear. Picking one side and condemning the other (in most cases, at least initially, the kids) is what got us here in the first place. That is what I meant.
It appears that you are forgetting something. The post you just quoted, in its entirety:
Why did you not include that last sentence in your quote?
Not saying this is what happened, but when you hit quote, you typically get what the poster posted at the time you're quoting. It is possible that the quoted poster added "And I'm not talking about the kids" after the fact. If you edit your post before a certain time frame, there will be no evidence at the end of the post that you edited it. I know this because I'm constantly editing my posts for grammar mistakes or typos that I've made. If I make them quick enough, no one gets to know that I misspelled a word. hahahaha
Not saying this is what happened, but when you hit quote, you typically get what the poster posted at the time you're quoting. It is possible that the quoted poster added "And I'm not talking about the kids" after the fact. If you edit your post before a certain time frame, there will be no evidence at the end of the post that you edited it. I know this because I'm constantly editing my posts for grammar mistakes or typos that I've made. If I make them quick enough, no one gets to know that I misspelled a word. hahahaha
I know that can happen, and if it's the case here, my apologies to WaldoKitty.
I think one thing that is going on here is that people are getting so emotional about this that it's become easy to read only part of a post and then jump to conclusions, or to assume disagreement where there is none. I'm sure I have done this, too.
Covington High Boys: Assault on Catholic Pro-Life Young Men
Not only the Left, but even Catholic bishops, priests, and intellectuals piled onto the Covington High boy accused of being racist and attacking a Native American man banging a drum at the March for Life. More footage reveals that the boy did nothing and some are apologizing. Dr Taylor Marshall and Timothy Gordon analyze why so many CATHOLICS wanted to condemn white, pro-life, young men. They also discuss why we need to rally to our young men.
Let's not forget that public figures, adults, are calling for the doxxing of these students. They want to see violence inflicted on them, over a hat, over a facial expression.
Some people say we need unity in this country. I don't want unity with these people. I want separation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
