Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:23 AM
 
12,017 posts, read 14,313,814 times
Reputation: 5981

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
most who scream "illegals" do not want to pay what it would cost to stop the problem.
Some of them even benefit from the "problem"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,201,702 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Ignore the problems........like jobs being offered. I look at it different. Address that or let them come by the millions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
Glad you agree the wall is useless as an effective long term deterrent, esp considering the cost. Yes we need to enforce more against employers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The rest of us want something which would actually work.

According to who? Statistics show border crossings peaked in 1985 and again in 2000, and then fell by about 50% in a matter of few years before any walls were built.
Little-to-nothing is going to be done against employers(IE in those states where e-verify is mandatory, it has made no difference). And a large portion of illegal-immigrants are working for individuals, who find them in front of places like Home Depot looking for day-labor. The enforcement of the laws is almost impossible, and there is no real political-will to do it.


And I find it obnoxious that "the left" rambles about the wall. But other than their hatred of corporations exploiting cheap labor, they could care less about immigration. They want sanctuary cities. They allow illegals to vote in local-elections, they give illegals driver's licenses and government benefits, and a large number of them want the abolition of ICE.


Nothing is actually going to be done about immigration, because the business-interests in the country love it, and because the left refuses to enforce the laws.

The wall won't stop all illegal-immigration. But to claim that the wall does nothing, would be like claiming that the walls/fences we already have, do nothing. Nonsense.

The border patrol says that the walls and fences are absolutely essential to their job. But so long as people in America continue to hire illegals(and they will, and nothing is going to change that), then the wall is merely a bandaid that at best slows down the flow, but is not a solution.


So is slowing down the flow even a few percent worth $5 billion? To people like myself, absolutely. Being that the $5 billion is just .1% of the federal budget, and would be a one-time expense.

Will people stop hiring illegal-immigrants? Will illegals stop being involved in underground markets, such as drugs and prostitution? Will sanctuary cities cease to exist?

I don't find this debate overly interesting. The only reason I even get involved in this stupidity, is that I get triggered when people claim "walls don't do anything". Nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:25 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,540 posts, read 28,625,446 times
Reputation: 25110
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
As I've pointed out many times, "The wall" does nothing about the who really knows how many million that are already here.
Most of the illegal immigrant families with anchor children who are already in the United States will simply remain in the United States until they kick the bucket. Their descendants will blend in with the rest of society over time.

That’s pretty much all there is to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:25 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
Except this is a highly partisan issue... Only one group wants the wall which will cost tens of billions, while the majority of the country would prefer that money be spent elsewhere

https://www.healthcarefinancenews.co...care-education
That the "right" points out in the past that the (D)'s supported building a wall is in fact true. Yes, it's a partisan issue. No matter what position one side takes, the other will take the other side and then flip when it becomes convenient.

Neither party is addressing the issue. The large number of low paying jobs being offered for people to come here illegally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:25 AM
 
2,642 posts, read 1,371,081 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
I have 2 friends whose DH's work for the DEA. They have told me for years whatever the USA comes up with to stop drug smuggling, the smugglers can defeat within days.
Well, apparently a significant portion if our population seriously entertains the thought that they can't figure out how to defeat a wall. That says something about us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:26 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I don't recall all these wall objectors crying about a wall back in 2006. Why is that? Hmm.
FWIW, Pelosi voted no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:27 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
Some of them even benefit from the "problem"
We have clearly seen that to be true. In general though, they are simply passing costs off on others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,374 posts, read 1,774,213 times
Reputation: 1994
Quote:
It's not a party/politics thing, it's for our national security. Why would they want uncontrolled entry into our country?
This is why

https://legacy.tyt.com/2018/07/05/de...son-donations/

"
Quote:
"A 2011 investigative report published by The Center for Media and Democracy detailed the connections between Rubio and GEO during his time in the Florida House. It notes that Rubio hired Donna Arduin, a former trustee for GEO’s Correctional Properties Trust, as an economic consultant. Arduin worked with Rubio’s then-budget chief, Ray Sansom, who pushed through a $110 million deal for a new GEO prison in the House Appropriations Bill. The report also detailed how legislation favorable to GEO Group has shadowed Arduin’s presence in government from California to Florida. In 2011, Florida Gov. Rick Scott – who also used Arduin as a budget adviser – pushed (unsuccessfully) to privatize 27 prisons south of Orlando.

Upon winning the Senate seat, Rubio tapped former lobbyist Cesar Conda as his chief of staff in 2011. Conda had co-founded what is now GEO’s main lobbying firm, Navigators Global, and after joining Rubio, continued receiving payments of $150,000 from the firm as part of a stock buyout arrangement. In April 2014, Conda went on to lead Rubio’s Reclaim America PAC as a senior adviser, until recently rejoining Navigators. During Conda’s time with Rubio, GEO became a top-10 contributor to Reclaim America, giving $16,000 in 2014, according to OpenSecrets.org. Conda’s firm also banked $610,000 from the private prison company between 2011 and 2014 as its lobbying firm. According to a disclosure form obtained by The Nation, among the issues Navigators lobbied for on GEO’s behalf was immigration reform"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.was...talking-about/

See who accepted PAC money
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/tot...107&cycle=2014
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:28 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
Little-to-nothing is going to be done against employers(IE in those states where e-verify is mandatory, it has made no difference).
As I pointed out and you ignored, that is 4 states and even in those states it is not mandatory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 07:30 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
Most of the illegal immigrant families with anchor children who are already in the United States will simply remain in the United States until they kick the bucket. Their descendants will blend in with the rest of society over time.

That’s pretty much all there is to it.
I do not disagree that this is what will happen. So we can continue to allow business to push their costs off on society or create a way to allow these people to contribute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top