Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
AOC? ............ Don't knock her. Trump may well be able to use her if the senate offers up a complete revamp of border security, which includes a deal for DACA, a pathway for citizenship and a barrier so that those expelled don't get right back in. That's the approach that makes sense and AOC doesn't seem to march to Nancy's beat.
Sometimes we forget that Nancy only has one vote.
Develops? I say she's doing exact what her handlers want. Soros Media Corp recruited her to be a rousing Marxist nutball, somebody to perhaps make Pocahontas seem more rational.
Either way, I as a woman, think the worst thing the civilized world has done was allow women the right to vote and to take up political possessions. No doubt, there are great women out there, but more or less, they are outnumbered by the emotional ding bats that sleep their way to the top instead of actually earning their way to the top.
Taxpayers are picking up the tab solely because of Wal-Mart’s practices.
“Fully compensated”...lol....can you mail me what you’re smoking? Employment status is wholly relevant as it’s literally what Wal-Mart’s practices exploit.
Libertarian fantasy-land is something else to behold.
The only way that what you are saying makes any sense is if people somehow have a right to full time employment that pays enough that they don’t qualify for any government assistance. People have no such right, except in your fantasy land.
If these marginal employees were unemployed instead of being employed by Walmart, would they receive more or less government assistance?
Given that the correct answer to the previous question is undeniable, what precisely is the “tab” that taxpayers are picking up, that is being caused by Walmart?
The only way that what you are saying makes any sense is if people somehow have a right to full time employment that pays enough that they don’t qualify for any government assistance. People have no such right, except in your fantasy land.
If these marginal employees were unemployed instead of being employed by Walmart, would they receive more or less government assistance?
Given that the correct answer to the previous question is undeniable, what precisely is the “tab” that taxpayers are picking up, that is being caused by Walmart?
The tab was $6.2 billion a year in welfare according to Forbes in 2014.
Your question is irrelevant deflection, as previously stated. A red-herring, so to speak.
Wal-Mart frequently ensures employees are brought on at exactly under full-time to reduce the benefits owed to employees, and taxpayers are footing the bill.
You mean like all of Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan has?
Clearly an impossible feat!
Did you miss the part about free????? It is not free in Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan! NOTHING is free! Having spent considerable time in Canada and Europe I can tell you that it is no panacea of healthcare!
At 29, this stupid girl has racked up all most as many gaffes as Weird Uncle Joe, and he's almost three times her age.
What is the conservative obsession with this woman? What other freshman representatives are triggering this kind of constant chatter over nothing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake
Someone with an IQ of 70 is the new face of the Democratic party. Seems about right I guess.
She's still smarter than the current occupant of the White House.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog
You realize that it's mostly the right trying to build her as the "face" of the Democratic Party, right?
Kinda hilarious, isn't it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1
^^^^^^This. They are using her to mainstream Communism in the U.S.
LMAO. Not only are you obsessed with her, but now you're delusional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd
That some WalMart employees are on public assistance doesn’t mean that WalMart is being subsidized by the government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd
Given that the correct answer to the previous question is undeniable, what precisely is the “tab” that taxpayers are picking up, that is being caused by Walmart?
Five pages later, and you still haven't figured it out? Try Googling "economics 101".
The tab was $6.2 billion a year in welfare according to Forbes in 2014.
Your question is irrelevant deflection, as previously stated. A red-herring, so to speak.
Wal-Mart frequently ensures employees are brought on at exactly under full-time to reduce the benefits owed to employees, and taxpayers are footing the bill.
How, specifically, does Walmart cause people to use government assistance?
If someone that is unemployed is receiving $X in government benefits, and then goes to work at Walmart and as result, receives less than $X in government benefits, what “Tab” is being paid by the taxpayers that is caused by Walmart? This is an easy question. Why don’t you try answering it, instead of steadfastly refusing to do so?
How, specifically, does Walmart cause people to use government assistance?
If someone that is unemployed is receiving $X in government benefits, and then goes to work at Walmart and as result, receives less than $X in government benefits, what “Tab” is being paid by the taxpayers that is caused by Walmart? This is an easy question. Why don’t you try answering it, instead of steadfastly refusing to do so?
It’s entirely irrelevant. These people aren’t unemployed. One could easily ask how much they’d be receiving in government benefits had their employers paid them enough to support themselves, sans welfare. I’m guessing my number turns out lower than yours.
Taxpayers are picking up the tab solely because of Wal-Mart’s practices.
“Fully compensated”...lol....can you mail me what you’re smoking? Employment status is wholly relevant as it’s literally what Wal-Mart’s practices exploit.
Libertarian fantasy-land is something else to behold.
If you as a single person can't survive on Walmart's $11 wage for full time work, something's wrong with you.
If you are part time employee at Walmart, making $11/hr as a greeter or a bag checker, I got a newsflash for you; people aren't supposed to be able to support themselves on a part time job bagging groceries. Never have, never will. Sadly, Walmart and every other chain have made most workers part time because of radical leftwing labor laws that discourage full-time hiring. If the leftwing stayed the hell out of business, people could work 40 hours a week and more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Employment status is wholly relevant as it’s literally what Wal-Mart’s practices exploit. 
