Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2019, 04:19 PM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,268,656 times
Reputation: 11907

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
I’m still working but I filed and got my approval to start receiving my check -(66) not trusting the Govt not to change things on me. Now to nest egg until I do retire. The money is Safer with me
You are better off to Suspend and draw it at the Maximum age rate - age 70.
Seriously -- look in to File and Suspend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2019, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,699 posts, read 21,054,375 times
Reputation: 14245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
You are better off to Suspend and draw it at the Maximum age rate - age 70.
Seriously -- look in to File and Suspend.
No, ty -I have a three year plan and both incomes will put me right were I need to be. There more to this story, but I really do not trust the govt not fouling up the ss in the next few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
4,958 posts, read 2,237,693 times
Reputation: 5839
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
It's funny because it will never happen, not at least while GOP controls the senate.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/03/u...-2100-act.html
Social security suffers from lack of modernization. The life expectancy at social security's initiation was 61. Today's life expectancy is 78 years old. The average retirement age of 65 has remained unchanged since 1935. Mathematically, neither program is sustainable without signification changes.

Here's my suggestion.

No one should be exempt from SS taxes. Whether you annually earn $1000 or $10,000,000, each person should fund their retirement and receive payment based on what they invested. No exceptions, no exemptions.

Spouses should receive their SS benefits AND that of their late spouse, with the exception that spouse remarries.

The government needs to instill upon Americans to invest in their own retirement. It's a ridiculous notion that anyone should rely on the government to live comfortably at any age when there are those that work their butts off day in and day out that never really achieve it.

Lastly, a 2% increase in benefits will not bring you out of poverty. Talk about bread crumbs.

Last edited by Mad_Jasper; 02-06-2019 at 05:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:28 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,527,236 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
You are better off to Suspend and draw it at the Maximum age rate - age 70.
Seriously -- look in to File and Suspend.
Yes but if you die at 75 - then you have lost money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia (Center City)
949 posts, read 788,833 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Once again, the New York Times proves that it cannot be truthful:

It would be the first major expansion of Social Security since 1972 and the most significant change in the program since 1983, when Congress stepped in to avert a financial crisis by raising taxes and the eligibility age for Social Security.

There was no major expansion in 1972.
Nixon expanded SS in 1972.

On July 1, 1972, President Nixon signed Public Law 92-336, a bill to extend the public debt limit. The legislation also contained amendment to the Social Security Act, raising the amount of monthly cash benefits and revising several financing provisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia (Center City)
949 posts, read 788,833 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Yes but if you die at 75 - then you have lost money.
LOL if you're dead, you won't care that you lost money... so funny! However, the longer you live, the more you will appreciate that you made a decision that maximized your monthly SS check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 04:26 AM
 
12,017 posts, read 14,323,903 times
Reputation: 5981
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotpair View Post
Was Kennedy the last Democrat who cared about the people? .
Eisenhower was the last republican I think
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 05:15 AM
 
2,646 posts, read 1,846,218 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
You are better off to Suspend and draw it at the Maximum age rate - age 70.
Seriously -- look in to File and Suspend.
I am not sorry that I started receiving Social Security at first chance. I have a pension, so lucky, about that; but Social Security has boosted my quality of life. Life is going by so fast, now. Looking back, I would have saved more; but still, who knows how long our life and quality of life will be?

Nixon did do some great things. Too bad he became paranoid. Being president must wear on the nerves can't even imagine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
It's funny because it will never happen, not at least while GOP controls the senate.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/03/u...-2100-act.html
Thousands of bills get introduced each year. Most go no place fast.

No shortage of politicians use bills created to demonstrate their follow through to their constituents and donors.

It’s as bipartisan as it gets.

Sooner or later Payroll Taxes will be increased. How much and when are the only wild cards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Yes but if you die at 75 - then you have lost money.
Insurance is the transfer of risk in exchange for a premium. When the government insures risk, it’s called a tax.

SS is old age income insurance.

If you buy term life insurance and don’t die, you have lost $.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top