Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Also what about those people that voted for Sanders over Hillary in 2016 and didn’t allow Hillary ton every primary and waltz into the nomination unopposed. Shame on those people
if this is true then we should just ban men from even participating in primaries. Since there is nothing to benefit from having them. As soon as someone like Elizabeth Warren, or Kamala Harris, or even Hillary enters office the country will be better. I also assume this goes true for a Republican woman vs a Democratic man.
if this is true then we should just ban men from even participating in primaries. Since there is nothing to benefit from having them. As soon as someone like Elizabeth Warren, or Kamala Harris, or even Hillary enters office the country will be better. I also assume this goes true for a Republican woman vs a Democratic man.
UNTIL they get pregnant, on the rag or just generally “bitc*yâ€
Sorry - to whom do you imagine Don Lemon to be an "icon"? Not any liberals I know.
Really. I don't watch CNN (like the OP apparently does) so I had to look this guy up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel
But sure, let's try banning men from politics altogether. Let's try it for, oh, a decade. I imagine at the end of the decade we'd have been national health and fewer wars.
Why not give it a real test? Take away their vote for a century and a half, like they did to women, and see where we end up then. I'm game. Women couldn't possibly screw it up any worse than the almost total rule of men has done.
if this is true then we should just ban men from even participating in primaries. Since there is nothing to benefit from having them. As soon as someone like Elizabeth Warren, or Kamala Harris, or even Hillary enters office the country will be better. I also assume this goes true for a Republican woman vs a Democratic man.
The feminization of the world has gone so far off the rails from what feminism was intended to mean.
It's just another tentacle of identity politics. I'm sorry to burst anyone's bubble, but there are as many heinous females as there are males. Males are mostly violent, women are decieptful, both are equally odious in their own ways.
Like I said, does this mean a Republican woman should get priority for office over a Democratic man ?Answer the question
If she is more qualified, sure. Hands down.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
