Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nothing cowardly about it...just an notion that will never happen, not in this lifetime. I don't have much of an opinion if its a good or bad idea, just that it will never happen.
I assume there will not be any mass shootings at that school, real or otherwise, if they are really doing that. (Even though the chances of that happening the first place is miniscule.)
LOL. they're just going to shove the problem around to other schools. Mostly because of perception. Shooter decides to shoot up school will just pick one that doesn't have them. If the shooter picks the school he attends though, and attends that one.....those security guards will be the first ones shot from behind with no warning. And if the shooter is smart they will grab the uniforms and any body armor.
1-2 armed guards wont cut it. 3-4 will. And they need to be in every school. Of course knowing American kids they will probably manage to get themselves shot by various armed guards as well. Fun times.
So this is wasteful. Its not enough to help, and all it will do is either arm the shooter better, or simply let them pick a different school.
Violence CAN solve problems. But the issue here is that insufficient potential violence is being used. More guards, in more locations, or its just a waste.
LOL. they're just going to shove the problem around to other schools. Mostly because of perception. Shooter decides to shoot up school will just pick one that doesn't have them. If the shooter picks the school he attends though, and attends that one.....those security guards will be the first ones shot from behind with no warning. And if the shooter is smart they will grab the uniforms and any body armor.
1-2 armed guards wont cut it. 3-4 will. And they need to be in every school. Of course knowing American kids they will probably manage to get themselves shot by various armed guards as well. Fun times.
So this is wasteful. Its not enough to help, and all it will do is either arm the shooter better, or simply let them pick a different school.
Violence CAN solve problems. But the issue here is that insufficient potential violence is being used. More guards, in more locations, or its just a waste.
Let's go with none and quit wetting our pants then.
So, again, are you saying this wouldn't happen with a private school? Homeschoolers don't have guns in the house?
There have been very few school shootings at private schools. The most notable is the one at that Amish school, but they're pacifists and don't own guns.
AOC is planning to in the Green New Deal, too many teacher farts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
