Nationwide constitutional carry in exchange for strengthening separation of church and state?

[Ex New Yorker]

Originally Posted by TwoByFour

In a word, hell no. My state (Hawaii) has one of the strictest laws on CC, and also has one of the lowest rates of gun violence. I don't want the gun nuts who feel like they have to run around with a pistol in their pocket coming here. That is not us.

Well good then stay on your little island. I don't want you coming over to the mainland either.

[burdell]

Nationwide constitutional carry in exchange for strengthening separation of church and state?


Too little information!

Would that nationwide carry require background checks? NO checks? Etc.

"Strengthening separation" means exactly what? Ban churches from fostering political positions? Tax them if they do? Etc.

The general question merits only a general response: possibly

[bus man]

Originally Posted by trobesmom

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...eaning-history
"But for the 70 years or so before a supreme court decision in 2008, he said, “the supreme court and federal courts held that it only applied in the context of militias, the right of states to protect themselves from federal interference".

For many decades, the Supreme Court held that racial segregation in public facilities was legal (c.f. Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896). Would I be correct in assuming that you approve of their changing of their minds in Brown v. Board of Education?