Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2019, 01:59 PM
 
18,801 posts, read 8,466,915 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
If they will let here certified doctors from civilized countries (EU, Australia, Japan etc) without crazy exams and certification?
120-150.
Is that for a 9-5 employed doc? Or is that for all docs? Primary care, specialists, surgeons and/or self employed office docs? 24 hour a day on call docs, locums docs? There is no standard doc and no standard going rate. that I know of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2019, 02:00 PM
 
18,801 posts, read 8,466,915 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
If they will let here certified doctors from civilized countries (EU, Australia, Japan etc) without crazy exams and certification?
120-150.
Is that for a 9-5 employed doc? Or is that for all docs? Primary care, specialists, surgeons and/or self employed office docs? 24 hour a day on call docs, locums docs? There is no standard doc and no standard going rate. that I know of.

I'm a doc. And I never took any 'crazy' exam or certification either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 03:07 PM
 
30,142 posts, read 11,778,294 times
Reputation: 18660
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lead View Post
Nothing

But I'd wager that if people had to make their own chicken nuggets at home, chicken nugget consumption would decrease dramatically.
Is that a reference to the pink slime fake news story? Or that people are lazy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 03:11 PM
 
10,075 posts, read 7,537,898 times
Reputation: 15501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
And what stops people from making junk food at home. Make cooking oil and sugar illegal?
because they don't know how to cook... that's the entire reason they eat out so much
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 03:49 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,656 posts, read 28,667,075 times
Reputation: 50525
Quote:
Originally Posted by MLSFan View Post
because they don't know how to cook... that's the entire reason they eat out so much
I think the reason they eat out is that they're used to it and have gotten lazy. That, and working all the time, they don't have enough time to cook.

But cooking doesn't have to take that long and there is a such thing as a microwave. Buy a rotisserie chicken, nuke a few baked potatoes, and some frozen vegetables. If they want to get fancy, steam a couple of carrots, lol.

People believe things they see on tv and social media so maybe the government should start putting ads on showing how to "cook" a simple meal. They got us to stop smoking by showing ads on tv, drug companies try to get us to take their latest prescription Rx by advertising on tv, so how about a few short cooking ads?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2019, 07:15 AM
 
30,142 posts, read 11,778,294 times
Reputation: 18660
Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
I think the reason they eat out is that they're used to it and have gotten lazy. That, and working all the time, they don't have enough time to cook.
Its not just eating out but what people buy at the supermarket. Here in Arizona there are state public service announcements trying to get people who get EBT to make healthy choices in the food they buy at supermarkets. Most of these people have the time to cook but often choose processed food instead of fresh vegetables and meat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
But cooking doesn't have to take that long and there is a such thing as a microwave. Buy a rotisserie chicken, nuke a few baked potatoes, and some frozen vegetables. If they want to get fancy, steam a couple of carrots, lol.
Crock pots are good. I use them. You don't need to be a 5 star chef to throw a bunch of ingredients in a pot and let it simmer all day. I also use a Foreman grill to grill chicken which is fast and easy to prepare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
People believe things they see on tv and social media so maybe the government should start putting ads on showing how to "cook" a simple meal. They got us to stop smoking by showing ads on tv, drug companies try to get us to take their latest prescription Rx by advertising on tv, so how about a few short cooking ads?
I would not say the government has stopped us from smoking. 38 million people still smoke. Most of the people smoking today were well aware of the dangers when they started, yet they did so anyways.

First you would need to ban junk food advertising. As it stands there are endless food prep videos on youtube and facebook. A few gov't PSA's is not going to counter the endless bad food choices advertised all day long which are very appealing to a big part of our population and a big source of revenue to all types of media.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2019, 07:53 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,989 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
I think the reason they eat out is that they're used to it and have gotten lazy. That, and working all the time, they don't have enough time to cook.

But cooking doesn't have to take that long and there is a such thing as a microwave. Buy a rotisserie chicken, nuke a few baked potatoes, and some frozen vegetables. If they want to get fancy, steam a couple of carrots, lol.

People believe things they see on tv and social media so maybe the government should start putting ads on showing how to "cook" a simple meal. They got us to stop smoking by showing ads on tv, drug companies try to get us to take their latest prescription Rx by advertising on tv, so how about a few short cooking ads?
Or substitute a bagged salad for the frozen veggies. Easy. Quick.

I agree 100% with what you've said. It's NOT hard OR costly to implement healthy eating habits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2019, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Federal Way, WA
662 posts, read 313,168 times
Reputation: 678
We could start off by taking the money used for farmer welfare in producing cheap gmo corn to make junk food and ethanol and reallocate that money toward the health care crisis that cheap junk food helps create. But yes, multinational conglomerates own our food system and would never allow that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2019, 09:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,989 posts, read 44,799,475 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFit View Post
We could start off by taking the money used for farmer welfare in producing cheap gmo corn to make junk food and ethanol and reallocate that money toward the health care crisis that cheap junk food helps create. But yes, multinational conglomerates own our food system and would never allow that.
80+% of the Farm Bill funds Food Stamps. End it. And end the Food Stamps program. I agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2019, 11:25 AM
 
13,602 posts, read 4,929,119 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That will generate the $3.2 trillion/year in additional tax revenue needed to fund Medicare for All (Urban Institute)? Show your math.
By simple extrapolation. Today Medicare spending is $700B. Since seniors account for 34% of healthcare spending, I estimate Medicare for all would cost $2.1 trillion (which is closer to Bernie Sanders' estimate).

Currently, Medicare is funded 40% from payroll tax, 40% from general fund (income tax, mostly) 15% from premiums and the rest other sources. Assuming the same ratios, Medicare for all could be paid by increasing payroll tax by a factor of 3, from 1.5 to 4.5%, plus a commensurate 3% rise in average income tax rates, although the rise in low to mid income tax rates would be less due to progressivity in the tax code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top