Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,828,087 times
Reputation: 35584

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by carcrazy67 View Post
So you are off grid and ride a bike....right?

LOL [crickets].

Because even the Chicken Littles know that those things won't change a thing. Nor will picking your pocket for carbon taxes--the real goal.

 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:09 PM
 
2,068 posts, read 999,218 times
Reputation: 3641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matadora View Post
You must not know what you're talking.

Models successfully reproduce temperatures since 1900 globally, by land, in the air and the ocean.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGF4-JyHh_8
I take the evidence from research scientists over a poster who demonstrates over and over they are clueless about climate science.

In what universe is YouTube considered to be a scientific publication?
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,541 posts, read 37,140,220 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacInTx View Post
In what universe is YouTube considered to be a scientific publication?
In what universe are scientists banned from You Tube? I suggest that you watch the video.
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:16 PM
 
2,068 posts, read 999,218 times
Reputation: 3641
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
In what universe are scientists banned from You Tube? I suggest that you watch the video.
I did.


Anyone can post a video on YouTube claiming to be a "scientist".
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,260,344 times
Reputation: 7528
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacInTx View Post
In what universe is YouTube considered to be a scientific publication?
Show me where YouTube published this video?

This video is a publication of the Texas Tech Public Media. Makes sense as she's a climate scientist, a professor in the Department of Political Science and director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University, part of the Department of Interior’s South-Central Climate Science Center.

It's on PBS and the climate researcher has her own YouTube channel.

Global Weirding: Climate, Politics, and Religion with Katharine Hayhoe is produced by KTTZ Texas Tech Public Media and distributed by PBS Digital Studios.

Global Weirding with Katharine Hayhoe

Katharine Hayhoe | Climate Scientist

Not very bright are you?
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,541 posts, read 37,140,220 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacInTx View Post
I did.


Anyone can post a video on YouTube claiming to be a "scientist".
She IS a scientist.

Katharine Anne Scott Hayhoe is an atmospheric scientist and professor of political science at Texas Tech University, where she is director of the Climate Science Center. She is also the CEO of the consulting firm ATMOS Research and Consulting. Wikipedia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvcToPZCLI
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,842,883 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Don't expect the denialists to believe it.

No, it snowed in Alaska today, so how can there be a problem ? They would never believe any of it, even if it bit them in the behind.
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,260,344 times
Reputation: 7528
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
She IS a scientist.

Katharine Anne Scott Hayhoe is an atmospheric scientist and professor of political science at Texas Tech University, where she is director of the Climate Science Center. She is also the CEO of the consulting firm ATMOS Research and Consulting. Wikipedia
Not only this but she helped write the 4th US National Climate Assessment.

She also has over 125 peer-reviewed papers, abstracts, and other publications.

Katharine Hayhoe Professor, Texas Tech University

See my post above. America we have a problem...

His inability to look up facts pretty much mirrors the IQ of climate deniers.

Last edited by Matadora; 03-07-2019 at 08:38 PM..
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearHeadDave View Post
You have to understand the the deniers don't have the foggiest clue what "five sigma" means, don't understand basic statistics and standard deviation and don't have any desire whatsoever to learn. Of course they still drive cars and use computers and cell phones and enjoy all the modern miracles of life in 2019. All of these technologies are dependent on a full understanding of physics, science and statistics - but for some reason they aren't refusing to trust them, are they? Climate change denial is just another example of willful strategic ignorance. But at this point it is nearly as indefensible as those that believe we never landed on the moon.

What was the average global surface temperature in 1929?

How do you know that number you have is accurate?

How much did the average global surface temperature vary from the normal temperature in 1929, and why?

What should the global average surface temperature be today, and why?

How much of that deviation is due to CO2 added to the atmosphere by humans and how much is due to other causes?

How can you know for sure?

What is the accurate mathematical relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and the average global surface temperature?

Based on this accurate mathematical relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and the average global surface temperature, has the average global surface temperature ever varied unexpectedly one way or the other, if so, why?
 
Old 03-07-2019, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,541 posts, read 37,140,220 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
What was the average global surface temperature in 1929?

How do you know that number you have is accurate?

How much did the average global surface temperature vary from the normal temperature in 1929, and why?

What should the global average surface temperature be today, and why?

How much of that deviation is due to CO2 added to the atmosphere by humans and how much is due to other causes?

How can you know for sure?

What is the accurate mathematical relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and the average global surface temperature?

Based on this accurate mathematical relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and the average global surface temperature, has the average global surface temperature ever varied unexpectedly one way or the other, if so, why?
I suggest that you do your own work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top