Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-04-2019, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,246,039 times
Reputation: 45135

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post
I agree with you! You’re pushing two political agendas, gun control and late term abortion. If you want to come on here and push your gun control agenda, no one is going to stop you. FWIW, guns are too entrenched in this culture to ever be removed. It would likely take many decades to get anywhere on that issue. Do you think people are going to just line up and give their guns to the government? If you have ideas, join online boards or write your representatives.

Infanticide is not what might happen, it’s what will happen, because the Senate voted to deny help to babies that survive abortion. I’ve read about some of these babies who actually survived such a thing, and someone took pity on them and gave them care. They went on to become intelligent and productive adults. It’s a sad commentary as to where we are headed as a society.
No one is going to abort third trimester pregnancies on demand. If there is a valid, compelling reason to deliver a third trimester fetus for the benefit of the mother, every effort will be made to help that baby survive if it is healthy itself. No new law is needed. The new law in NY decriminalized termination of third trimester pregnancies where the outcome for the fetus would be fatal. The only question would be whether the demise happened before delivery or after delivery, and that decision should be up to the family actually facing such a horrible situation, with input from physicians with expertise and experience in dealing with devastating birth defects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post
I’m not arguing first trimester abortions. Those laws have been in place for a long while. What is troubling are current laws leaning towards later abortions on demand. The New Reproductive Health Act is going to open the door for other states to follow suit. Sure, you can parrot the “safe, legal and rare” party line, but the 24 week limit was removed. This issue is headed towards the interest of the mother, not the baby.

It’s interesting you and other posters, never addressed babies who were born alive and got the chance to grow up.
No, the law does not extend abortion on demand past 24 weeks. After that point there must either be a compelling, valid maternal indication to end the pregnancy, and every effort will be made to deliver a healthy baby, or there must be severe birth defects with a dismal prognosis for the baby, usually resulting in stillbirth or neonatal death.

You are trying to read something into the law which is just not there.

Doctors will not be terminating third trimester pregnancies for trivial reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2019, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,628,472 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post

Infanticide is not what might happen, it’s what will happen, because the Senate voted to deny help to babies that survive abortion. I’ve read about some of these babies who actually survived such a thing, and someone took pity on them and gave them care. They went on to become intelligent and productive adults. It’s a sad commentary as to where we are headed as a society.
But the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 enacted August 5, 2002 extends legal protection to an infant born alive after a failed attempt at induced abortion. Tell me just how the heck can you be so terribly naive and so incredibly stupid as to assume babies won't be killed simply if Congress passes the latest babies born alive law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,179 posts, read 2,128,060 times
Reputation: 7944
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
No one is going to abort third trimester pregnancies on demand. If there is a valid, compelling reason to deliver a third trimester fetus for the benefit of the mother, every effort will be made to help that baby survive if it is healthy itself. No new law is needed. The new law in NY decriminalized termination of third trimester pregnancies where the outcome for the fetus would be fatal. The only question would be whether the demise happened before delivery or after delivery, and that decision should be up to the family actually facing such a horrible situation, with input from physicians with expertise and experience in dealing with devastating birth defects.



No, the law does not extend abortion on demand past 24 weeks. After that point there must either be a compelling, valid maternal indication to end the pregnancy, and every effort will be made to deliver a healthy baby, or there must be severe birth defects with a dismal prognosis for the baby, usually resulting in stillbirth or neonatal death.

You are trying to read something into the law which is just not there.

Doctors will not be terminating third trimester pregnancies for trivial reasons.
I didn’t say the law extends abortion on demand past 24 weeks. I have said repeatedly there is potential for abuse due to vague wording of the ‘health’ of the mother.

Who said anything about Dr’s? A licensed healthcare provider is all that is required now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,628,472 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post
I didn’t say the law extends abortion on demand past 24 weeks. I have said repeatedly there is potential for abuse due to vague wording of the ‘health’ of the mother.

Who said anything about Dr’s? A licensed healthcare provider is all that is required now.
How do you know about the potential. Have you work in an abortion clinic? Do you know of any women who changed her mind and got an abortion during the 3rd trimester even though the doctor thought the unborn baby was viable? If so, could the woman afford the much higher cost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,179 posts, read 2,128,060 times
Reputation: 7944
Default ,

Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
But the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 enacted August 5, 2002 extends legal protection to an infant born alive after a failed attempt at induced abortion. Tell me just how the heck can you be so terribly naive and so incredibly stupid as to assume babies won't be killed simply if Congress passes the latest babies born alive law?
That’s the whole point, genius. A law will only regulate human behavior up to a certain extent. Women have repeatedly given other women a halo if they want a late term abortion. I don’t buy into this wonderful and confidential ‘between a woman and her Dr’ idea. Humans are far from perfect and people’s motivations can vary widely. There are women and Dr’s who are unscrupulous, who would have thought? Anyway, in New York, it’s now between a woman and her health care provider.

The Senate had the chance to give babies born alive a fighting chance and they didn’t. Of course some babies born alive will be killed and it will be covered up, but this new law opens the door a bit wider for such abuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 10:02 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,181,556 times
Reputation: 17209
Helping babies after they are born.....what a novel idea. Why stop at the few moments after birth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,179 posts, read 2,128,060 times
Reputation: 7944
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
How do you know about the potential. Have you work in an abortion clinic? Do you know of any women who changed her mind and got an abortion during the 3rd trimester even though the doctor thought the unborn baby was viable? If so, could the woman afford the much higher cost?
Read the wording in the law. My guess is that we’ll be reading about various situations regarding this law in the months to come. People on both sides of the asile will be arguing about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 10:30 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,002,303 times
Reputation: 15559
Will repeat -- if this bill was so critical -- why wait until you lost the control in the House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:07 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,246,039 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post
I didn’t say the law extends abortion on demand past 24 weeks. I have said repeatedly there is potential for abuse due to vague wording of the ‘health’ of the mother.

Who said anything about Dr’s? A licensed healthcare provider is all that is required now.
You said

Quote:
Sure, you can parrot the “safe, legal and rare” party line, but the 24 week limit was removed.
Other providers can perform early terminations (where the state* allows), many of which are now done with medications. That would include people trained to do it, including physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurse midwives. None of those are going to be doing third trimester terminations because they will not have the training and experience. There are literally about half a dozen people who do.

*https://npwomenshealthcare.com/the-c...ider-vol3-no2/

Twelve states allow NPs to provide medication abortions and six allow them to do aspiration abortions.

https://www.romper.com/p/how-many-la...-handful-21462
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:11 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,246,039 times
Reputation: 45135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz22 View Post
Of course some babies born alive will be killed and it will be covered up, but this new law opens the door a bit wider for such abuses.
No. That is infanticide, and the NY law does not make it legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top