Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
But the left has ALWAYS been about top down control, a powerful federal government and a marginalization of states rights. That's what caused the Civil War in the first place not just slavery.

Democrats are the ones pushing their policies nationwide, not content to just have it in their own states. Its in their nature to push their leftism on those of us in Red America. For example besides abortion they also want stricter gun laws nationwide even though its their Democrat controlled urban areas that suffer from gun violence yet they want to restrict gun rights in rural America even though gun violence simply isn't a problem in rural areas. They also wanted to force Obamacare nationwide - it wasn't enough for Massachusetts to have socialized medicine. They also wanted to force all states to have gay marriage going against our culture and religion here. The Obama EPA went to Appalachia and launched the war on coal even though nobody in WV or Kentucky wanted them there and supported the coal miners.

We don't go up to Chicago and tell them they can't have those ridiculous gun laws, We don't tell California they can't have ridiculous emissions laws that cause them to have the highest gas prices in the nation. So yes its better on all these issues for us to just leave one another alone.
That's simply tough how rural people in a democracy can't always rule and have their way. For instance, in Oklahoma, most rural counties were quite strongly opposed to legalizing medical marijuana by up to 60 to 70%. But they were overwhelmed by the urban vote. Medical marijuana won by 57%. Now, a rural legislator's bill to allow counties to vote to ban all marijuana probably won't pass.

Speaking of ObamaCare, if rural America thinks it's wrong and immoral to accept any more Medicaid, then it's their loss when hospitals close. Also as more and more rural Americans move out from there, don't be surprised if their priorities are less and less represented from state capitols to Washington, DC.

Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 02-27-2019 at 04:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:02 PM
 
334 posts, read 227,329 times
Reputation: 1180
No, hell no, and &@&@ No. Clear enough ;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
Red states are not pushing to ban abortion, gun control, or obamacare nationwide. Its the left that is forcing THEIR policies nationwide. So Roe vs Wade isn't about protecting abortion in New York and California its about forcing us here in Louisiana to accept it.

Louisiana law does say that as soon as Roe vs Wade is repealed, abortion will end here. There are only 3 abortion clinics in the entire state and that's 3 too many. Being pro-life is the one issue that nearly all voters in Louisiana agree on regardless of our racial and religious differences. No politician of either party can hope to win an election outside the immediate city of New Orleans without being pro-life.
So you quite strongly believe that Louisiana should become an export state of abortion by banning all abortion there. Just how moral is that, like when women die requiring an abortion during their travels to get them in legal states? OR do you pretty strongly believe such woman deserve as much as death from doing that? If so, so much for being pro life.

By the way, does Louisiana law make clear that sales of all contraceptives must be banned should Roe v. Wade be overturned. If not, then you're wrong for thinking all abortion will end in Louisiana. Many pro-life people strongly believe that contraceptives are the same as abortion.

Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 02-27-2019 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:12 PM
 
5,051 posts, read 3,580,440 times
Reputation: 6512
Another story from a country that severely restricts abortions:


https://www.france24.com/en/20190227...bortion-debate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:17 PM
 
3,357 posts, read 1,234,070 times
Reputation: 2302
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
no-one is talking about overturning r-v-w, not even the staunchest republican/conservatives

99% of conservatives don't want abortions banned.. its a choice... we just don't want our tax dollars to pay for your poor choices
If 99% don’t want them banned, then why the fight?
Over the years, Tax dollars have been reduced to pay for abortions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:21 PM
 
Location: SoCal & Mid-TN
2,325 posts, read 2,652,251 times
Reputation: 2874
Just to play devil's advocate - what would happen to all those babies? Parent's either can't afford them or don't want them for one reason or another. They will be of all different races and some will have physical problems/birth defects. Do you think there are enough responsible people out there to adopt ALL of them? Do you support gov't funded health care for the babies that have serious health issues? What about funds to take care of the babies if the poor parents decide to keep the child? IOW, what are you willing to do to make sure these babies have a decent chance at life after they are born?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
Another story from a country that severely restricts abortions:


https://www.france24.com/en/20190227...bortion-debate
I wonder if that country is so sick and immoral under its religion that the grandpa is still a free man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,456 posts, read 4,040,143 times
Reputation: 8481
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
Same-sex marriage angers a lot of people but I think overall America will be able to live with it provided that businesses are allowed to discriminate on religious grounds (yes, we will probably have to concede this to the Christian Right in the coming years). However I believe abortion is the one no-compromise issue and I wonder if overturning Roe v Wade is necessary at this point in order to bring some sense of civility back to politics. Blue states can allow abortions and red states can ban them. Meanwhile 40% of the country won't have to continue to support a madman for the greater good of ending abortion. The Christian Right will lose much of its reason for existing as a political bloc once Roe v Wade is overturned. Getting religion out of politics is at the top of the list with a bullet exactly what this country needs right now. Note that I don't support the overturn of Roe v Wade, I'm just being realistic about where we are at right now.
I personally think the government needs to get out of marriage period. No more different tax brackets for being married, no more special laws protecting a spouse against testifying. If someone wants to have a marriage and have a ceremony, have at it. If someone wants to change their name so they can take their beloved's name, there are already laws on the books to help with that. Same with child custody and what not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,734,867 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by rigby06 View Post
The supreme Court almost never reverses a previously decision case. They consider it settled and law.
They have done a complete 180 on several occasions. Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned for example. We'll see what happens.

The thing that absolutely baffles me: How is this a Constitutional matter? Every other matter determining who has the right to live, defining murder vs self-defense vs involuntary manslaughter, and anything else to do with the criminalization of terminating human life is defined by State and Local governments. The Supreme Court has had a very bad habit of overreaching and exceeding its authority. Heck, according to the Constitution, the SCOTUS really hasn't got much authority at all, but even the authority that everyone grants them by tradition, they seriously had to make sh-t up to make it a Constitutional matter. Whether you're pro-abortion or anti-abortion, the matter should have never been ruled on by the Supreme Court and the Federal Government has no business weighing in on it at all. Seriously, can anyone tell me how you fit abortions into interstate and/or international trade?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2019, 04:29 PM
 
3,930 posts, read 2,097,931 times
Reputation: 4580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spikett View Post
Just to play devil's advocate - what would happen to all those babies? Parent's either can't afford them or don't want them for one reason or another. They will be of all different races and some will have physical problems/birth defects. Do you think there are enough responsible people out there to adopt ALL of them? Do you support gov't funded health care for the babies that have serious health issues? What about funds to take care of the babies if the poor parents decide to keep the child? IOW, what are you willing to do to make sure these babies have a decent chance at life after they are born?
I’m not for abortion but this has been my big problem with those looking to banned it to save the life of the child many of 5hose are opposed to more support to make sure those children have a better chance at life once they are born. They are the first to complain about food stamps etc, remember the welfare mothers that would have children just to get government aid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top