Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He knows a lot of people. There is no evidence that he ever participated in any of these parties or trips, unlike President Clinton and a number of other prominent Democrats. That is the truth and those are the facts.
None. You have inferred that Trump is somehow close to this guy, or guilty by association. There is literally no basis on which to promote this falsehood, other than the constantly lying Democrat left Trump haters are all repeating it to each other in the Democrat left online echo chambers and on television.
There is at this point a very well established pattern and practice of aggressive, unconscionable lies and baseless smears having been targeted at Trump by the Democrat left TDS echo chamber. All the continuation of this practice accomplishes at this point is to further establish how completely untrustworthy and morally depraved these people are.
You should think about that and commit yourself to not behaving this way.
There's no evidence that Clinton participated in them either.
Or, rather, the evidence for Clinton's participation is pretty much equivalent to the evidence for Trump's participation. They definitely saw each other socially. They were all involved in Big Charity events. There's no substantiated reports that either ever visited Epstein's island. And there are many men in Epstein's contact list of whom the same can be said.
He knows a lot of people. There is no evidence that he ever participated in any of these parties or trips, unlike President Clinton and a number of other prominent Democrats. That is the truth and those are the facts.
None. You have inferred that Trump is somehow close to this guy, or guilty by association. There is literally no basis on which to promote this falsehood, other than the constantly lying Democrat left Trump haters are all repeating it to each other in the Democrat left online echo chambers and on television.
There is at this point a very well established pattern and practice of aggressive, unconscionable lies and baseless smears having been targeted at Trump by the TDS afflicted Democrat left. All that the continuation of this practice accomplishes at this point is to further establish how completely untrustworthy and morally depraved these people are.
You should think about that and commit yourself to not behaving this way or dirtying yourself by associating with these sorts of people.
Actually the smears that include Trump are directed at a group that does in fact exist. It was clearly stated in the initial Epstein/Acosta agreement that certain other unindicted co conspirators exist and would not be charged. There is no actual knowledge as to whether Trump is, or is not, in this group. He clearly is in the population from which the group was created - Those who were friends of Epstein in the time of the attack.
Trump may well be totally exonerated. Then again he may not be.
I will take the wise person route and simply point out that the guilt or innocence of Trump is yet to be determined.
There's no evidence that Clinton participated in them either.
Or, rather, the evidence for Clinton's participation is pretty much equivalent to the evidence for Trump's participation. They definitely saw each other socially. They were all involved in Big Charity events. There's no substantiated reports that either ever visited Epstein's island. And there are many men in Epstein's contact list of whom the same can be said.
That is not correct, as you surely know very well. Bill Clinton participated on at least 26 flights on Epstein's airplane, according to the flight logs.
Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express”-- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.
Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.
“Bill Clinton … associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile,” said Conchita Sarnoff, of the Washington, D.C. based non-profit Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking, and author of a book on the Epstein case called "TrafficKing." “Why would a former president associate with a man like that?”
Does that PROVE that Clinton is guilty of raping children? No, certainly not. But what business did he or anyone have flying around with this guy? That at this point is a question that clearly needs to be asked and answered, especially on any flights that any of these underage girls also flew on.
This is a direct connection that does not look good. It is not anything nearly so vague as that Clinton "knew him". But rather, that Clinton and Epstein clearly had a close personal relationship and traveled together quite a lot.
There is nothing like this associated with Trump. Nothing. Or if you think there is, please feel free to provide some solid backup for what will otherwise be baseless hearsay.
Since all this is finally coming out maybe now we can revisit the Pizzagate story and actually have it be investigated. Either debunk it or see if it was all too horribly real. And look into other darkly rumored background of men like the Podestas who make Jeffrey Epstein look like Fred Rogers. DC may not be a swamp so much as a cesspool of filth and depravity.
Actually the smears that include Trump are directed at a group that does in fact exist. It was clearly stated in the initial Epstein/Acosta agreement that certain other unindicted co conspirators exist and would not be charged. There is no actual knowledge as to whether Trump is, or is not, in this group. He clearly is in the population from which the group was created - Those who were friends of Epstein in the time of the attack.
Trump may well be totally exonerated. Then again he may not be.
I will take the wise person route and simply point out that the guilt or innocence of Trump is yet to be determined.
Unconscionable smears and lies.
So, it is not despicable enough for you to infer that someone that is unindicted is somehow guilty by association. No, that is just a warmup for you apparently. But in this case, since there is no knowledge of who may or may not be on any such list, it should be inferred that Trump is probably implicated until he is somehow "exhonerated".
Of course the only way that someone can actually be "exhonerated" is to be 1) charged with a crime, 2) tried, and 3) found not guilty.
But there is literally no direct connection with Trump and any of this at all - as you know very well.
That is not correct, as you surely know very well. Bill Clinton participated on at least 26 flights on Epstein's airplane, according to the flight logs.
Always the lies. None of those flights on which Clinton was present went to the US Virgin Islands. And on most, if not all, of those flights he was accompanied by Secret Service or staff or both.
Quote:
Does that PROVE that Clinton is guilty of raping children? No, certainly not. But what business did he or anyone have flying around with this guy? That at this point is a question that clearly needs to be asked and answered, especially on any flights that any of these underage girls also flew on.
This is a direct connection that does not look good. It is not anything nearly so vague as that Clinton "knew him". But rather, that Clinton and Epstein clearly had a close personal relationship and traveled together quite a lot.
There is nothing like this associated with Trump. Nothing. Or if you think there is, please feel free to provide some solid backup for what will otherwise be baseless hearsay.
Epstein had an airplane capable of international flight and was willing to let Clinton grab rides to places he needed to be.
Explain to me what law it is that is violated by flying on an airplane with young women. I would suspect I have done it at least a few thousand times. Never charged with anything by anybody.
Of course there is...he opined that Epstein shared his taste for lovely women though he added that Epstein liked them young. That certainly implies he was aware of what Epstein was doing but did nothing about it. In fact you could read his comment as approving of Epstein's acts.
Always the lies. None of those flights on which Clinton was present went to the US Virgin Islands. And on most, if not all, of those flights he was accompanied by Secret Service or staff or both.
Epstein had an airplane capable of international flight and was willing to let Clinton grab rides to places he needed to be.
Explain to me what law it is that is violated by flying on an airplane with young women. I would suspect I have done it at least a few thousand times. Never charged with anything by anybody.
Of course there is...he opined that Epstein shared his taste for lovely women though he added that Epstein liked them young. That certainly implies he was aware of what Epstein was doing but did nothing about it. In fact you could read his comment as approving of Epstein's acts.
And now you are defending these monsters. Why am I not surprised? You make me want to vomit.
So, it is not despicable enough for you to infer that someone that is unindicted is somehow guilty by association. No, that is just a warmup for you apparently. But in this case, since there is no knowledge of who may or may not be on any such list, it should be inferred that Trump is probably implicated until he is somehow "exhonerated".
Of course the only way that someone can actually be "exhonerated" is to be 1) charged with a crime, 2) tried, and 3) found not guilty.
But there is literally no direct connection with Trump and any of this at all - as you know very well.
There is every reason to believe there is a group of men who aided or participated in the evils of Epstein. The group from which those men come includes Donald Trump.
Trump may well be completely innocent. Or he may not be. His comment about Epstein's fondness for younger women implies knowledge of what was happening.
There is every reason to believe there is a group of men who aided or participated in the evils of Epstein. The group from which those men come includes Donald Trump.
Trump may well be completely innocent. Or he may not be. His comment about Epstein's fondness for younger women implies knowledge of what was happening.
Where are you getting the bolded? That seems to be something you’ve made up. From all indications, those co-conspirators who were granted immunity from the Acosta deal appear to be staff and other women who helped recruit additional women. This has been widely reported.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.