Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-10-2019, 07:32 PM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,455,014 times
Reputation: 1755

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
You mean American women wear a wig over their hair on Saturdays (Sabbath) like Jewish women do when they go out?
Or wear a scarf to cover their hair as the Amish and other Christian sects do?
Get over it. Ilham looks beautiful in her hijab, with her bright eyes and beautiful lips. Judge Jeanine is jealous.
They might not choose, or have to choose to break the law but if you asked the Jewish women, and the Christian or Amish if they would choose their religious laws over the constitution I guarantee they'd say yes and so would Omar.

Religion has no place in politics because it's so influential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-10-2019, 07:44 PM
 
388 posts, read 200,660 times
Reputation: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
Except we're not so much talking about a dress code as much as an enemy uniform.
except its not even an outfit, its a single article of clothing that is no more a "uniform" than a PAIR OF BOOTS is.

uniforms make it very clear what side a person is on. a pair of boots doesnt-- and to be honest, neither does a scarf. the vary in style, they very in shape and colour-- they even vary wildly in reasons worn and cultures they come from. its about as far from a uniform as something gets.

Quote:
She is a terrorist
you just think they didnt do any vetting at all when she was elected, or every time she walks into the building she works in? really.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post
Religion has no place in politics because it's so influential.
both jews and sikhs are allowed to wear religious head coverings at airports and in the senate building. theres no reason to make an exception against one religion here, when we allow very similar (sometimes indistinguishable) coverings for others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 07:44 PM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,455,014 times
Reputation: 1755
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Her comments were so stupid that I'm surprised anyone would bother with her.

At one time Americans questioned whether or not Catholics could follow the Constitution. This Judge is a Catholic.

How quickly she forgets.

Google Omar and her comments on Sharia Law...or listen to Judge Jeanine.....if you want to be blind you can.
In a 2012 tweet, for instance, the Democrat explained that “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine #Israel.”

Omar obviously sides with Palestine when it comes to the religious war between Palestine and Israel. She consults Allah, not the president of the U.S. Now she comes in and disagrees with funding Israel? LMAO, of course, she does. If you think this has nothing to do with her beliefs then you are wrong. The headgear just emphasizes how strong her beliefs are.

Now, Judge Jeanine is obnoxious but she's not the only one wondering if Omar's religious beliefs are influencing her judgment. Trust me, it's evident they are. ALL religion should stay out of our government and yes, we have a long way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 07:51 PM
 
388 posts, read 200,660 times
Reputation: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post
ALL religion should stay out of our government
and vice versa.

Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
read the second part.

thats the part that addresses this directly. you want to get rid of that? this is really, really, really, really, really simple. a lot of you are arguing against the first amendment. you just dont get it. its her right under the constitution. theres not a lot of ways to misunderstand that, unless youre not paying attention.

the military (as well as congress) SWEARS AN OATH to protect THESE rules.

they go out and defend HER right and our rights to do these things. thats what we have a military for. that may not always be what we use the military for, but these rights are the reason the military exists-- to protect them. you wanna get rid of it? article v gives you a way to do it. be careful what you wish for, you might want to read it a few more times first and really think about what youre saying.

Last edited by dynamicjson; 03-10-2019 at 08:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 07:59 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,802,950 times
Reputation: 15334
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
Good question !

Of course not a question liberals will ever ask because it’s not “politically correct “

But a good question nevertheless .
——-
Fox News host Jeanine Pirro on Saturday questioned whether Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-Minn.) hijab is a symbol of loyalty to Sharia law, which she warned is "antithetical" to the U.S. Constitution.

Pirro made the suggestion during the opening monologue of her show "Justice with Judge Jeanine."

"Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won't get molested," she said.

"Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?" she asked.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...alty-to-sharia
Of course she asks that question. She and Hannity are obsessed with sharia law, lol. Anything to stir the pot. Dumb asses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,692 posts, read 21,049,622 times
Reputation: 14243
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
Good question !

Of course not a question liberals will ever ask because it’s not “politically correct “

But a good question nevertheless .
——-
Fox News host Jeanine Pirro on Saturday questioned whether Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-Minn.) hijab is a symbol of loyalty to Sharia law, which she warned is "antithetical" to the U.S. Constitution.

Pirro made the suggestion during the opening monologue of her show "Justice with Judge Jeanine."

"Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won't get molested," she said.

"Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?" she asked.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...alty-to-sharia
Don’t know how she ever became a judge. So biased ugh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:06 PM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,626,404 times
Reputation: 12560
Judge Jeanine is a typical political hack. She is another example of Faux News just being in Trumps pocket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:07 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,008,400 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post
In a 2012 tweet, for instance, the Democrat explained that “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel. #Gaza #Palestine #Israel.”

Omar obviously sides with Palestine when it comes to the religious war between Palestine and Israel. She consults Allah, not the president of the U.S. Now she comes in and disagrees with funding Israel? LMAO, of course, she does. If you think this has nothing to do with her beliefs then you are wrong. The headgear just emphasizes how strong her beliefs are.

Now, Judge Jeanine is obnoxious but she's not the only one wondering if Omar's religious beliefs are influencing her judgment. Trust me, it's evident they are. ALL religion should stay out of our government and yes, we have a long way to go.
But many Americans support the Palestinians -- (I am not saying I do) but they don't wear a head dress so we don't think they are dangerous?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:08 PM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,984,404 times
Reputation: 29442
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertwrench View Post
Identity politics is the tool of the left and only divides not unites.
I know introspection isn't a right-wing value, but singling out a congresswoman for what she wears - and by extension, her faith - falls 100% within the definition of identity politics. Words mean things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,503,175 times
Reputation: 25770
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynamicjson View Post
except its not even an outfit, its a single article of clothing that is no more a "uniform" than a PAIR OF BOOTS is.

uniforms make it very clear what side a person is on. a pair of boots doesnt-- and to be honest, neither does a scarf. the vary in style, they very in shape and colour-- they even vary wildly in reasons worn and cultures they come from. its about as far from a uniform as something gets.



you just think they didnt do any vetting at all when she was elected, or every time she walks into the building she works in? really.



both jews and sikhs are allowed to wear religious head coverings at airports and in the senate building. theres no reason to make an exception against one religion here, when we allow very similar (sometimes indistinguishable) coverings for others.
It is exactly the same as wearing a pointy white hat that masks your face...

Islam is primarily a political organ, not a "religion". It started as a gang, following a violent warlord. One that embraced slaughter, rape, slavery, the subjugation and abuse of women, and pedophilia. Muhammad's followers at the time embraced those same acts and principles. Thing is, after doing so it's possible some might have attacks of conscience. So Mo has a problem-how to address the basic immorality of his actions and those of his followers. Spark of brilliance-claim to be a "prophet" that talks to god and create a religion that embraces and codifies those very acts. You not only give moral justification to your followers, but draw in a whole new group of followers that want to perform the same acts.

Embracing symbols of Islam is comparable to embracing the Swastika or the KKK Hoodie. Are they allowed in the United States? Yes-because of our constitution. Does that make them "right" or moral?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top