Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Why won't Pelosi impeach Trump?
They have enough on Trump, Pelosi is just sincere in not wanting to divide the country over someone who isn't worth it 33 21.85%
Pelosi is waiting for more to come from the fishing expedition 7 4.64%
They clearly don't have enough or perhaps even anything impeachable on Trump 111 73.51%
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-13-2019, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,221 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15619

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by exm View Post
Investigations are pointless for criminal purposes and definitely not a basis for impeachment.


The check he wrote to Stormy Daniels WORSE CASE scenario could be a campaign violation (you know, the thing Obama also paid a fine for).
Completely different, this was paying a bribe to silence a mistress, I think the voters would have liked to know more about his girlfriends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2019, 04:54 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,453 posts, read 15,236,363 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Completely different, this was paying a bribe to silence a mistress, I think the voters would have liked to know more about his girlfriends.
Why? All that matters is the campaign finance violations. They both had them. The stories surrounding them may be salacious and entertaining, but they dont change the actual violation.

Voters may have liked to know more, but paying for her silence, in and of itself, is not illegal. And everyone already knew the kind of guy Trump was, before the election. So what do you think that would have changed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,204 posts, read 19,191,156 times
Reputation: 38266
There isn't anything analogous to sloppy record keeping in the final frenzied days of a campaign and deliberately paying off a porn star to try to avoid an adulterous affair from becoming public
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,250,882 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
Why? All that matters is the campaign finance violations. They both had them. The stories surrounding them may be salacious and entertaining, but they dont change the actual violation.

Voters may have liked to know more, but paying for her silence, in and of itself, is not illegal. And everyone already knew the kind of guy Trump was, before the election. So what do you think that would have changed?
John Edwards. Look it up. What Trump is doing is equal to or worse. Same principle. Money to the mistress/pornstar/playmate to keep the story under wraps in order to get elected under false pretenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 05:20 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,453 posts, read 15,236,363 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
John Edwards. Look it up. What Trump is doing is equal to or worse. Same principle. Money to the mistress/pornstar/playmate to keep the story under wraps in order to get elected under false pretenses.
I dont have to look it up, I remember it. If what you say is true, and it is “equalâ€, and it is the “same principleâ€, then that is good news for Trump. Edwards was acquitted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 05:28 PM
 
3,637 posts, read 1,696,722 times
Reputation: 5465
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Pelosi says he's not worth impeaching.

Trump says he is too, so there.

I'm surprised Trump didn't say "nananana .......I am too !"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2019, 07:58 AM
exm
 
3,720 posts, read 1,778,252 times
Reputation: 2849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
John Edwards. Look it up. What Trump is doing is equal to or worse. Same principle. Money to the mistress/pornstar/playmate to keep the story under wraps in order to get elected under false pretenses.

John Edwards was acquitted, wasn't he?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2019, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,863 posts, read 9,515,083 times
Reputation: 15573
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Pelosi says that Trump isn't fit to be president, but it would be too divisive to impeach him, especially as he isn't worth even that.

Isn't that tacitly admitting that they still don't really have anything on him yet? If they truly had the goods why wouldn't they go for it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.717753fe9c70
Now that Pelosi is going for it, I wonder if some people in this thread will come back and say that must mean they have something on him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2019, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,863 posts, read 9,515,083 times
Reputation: 15573
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I said this back in January. As long as Pelosi is Speaker, Trump won't be impeached.
Oops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2019, 07:39 PM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Now that Pelosi is going for it, I wonder if some people in this thread will come back and say that must mean they have something on him.



You obviously don't know the difference between an impeachment inquiry and and actual impeachment....


You know there is a huge difference, yes?


But why would they just need a inquiry, when they supposedly, this should be easy......then why the inquiry.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top