Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,119 posts, read 16,115,879 times
Reputation: 14408

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
Things are coming to a head. Get ready for Trump’s tweet meltdown in 3,2,1...
waiting...

 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,502 posts, read 6,115,417 times
Reputation: 6531
Not sure why we wouldn't believe it. We may not even get to see it.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,119 posts, read 16,115,879 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by BELMO45 View Post
Most likely they’ll say there wasn’t enough evidence for a Trump indictment but that there is fairly strong evidence nonetheless to say there was collusion. So basically like the OJ verdict. We know he did it but the evidence suggested enough doubt that by the book you couldn’t convict
you keep believing that metaphor
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:57 PM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,386 posts, read 6,715,271 times
Reputation: 16243
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
There are. Just not unsealed yet.

Patience. We want to see them as much as you do.
Really? How is Mueller's office going to prosecute these indictments when there will be no Office of the Special Counsel?
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
3,614 posts, read 1,723,198 times
Reputation: 2740
Dems didn't get what they wanted from Muller. They knew for YEARS they wouldn't get anything out of Muller. They were hoping that Trump would have tripped over his own dick by now and they could get him on something totally unrelated. Now the Dems excuses will come hard and fast. Dems are already seething at Muller.

I find it Ironic that Dems are screaming for the report to be made public but it can't be made public due to laws that DEMOCRATS put in place in the '90s by Janet Reno to protect Clinton from the full impact of Ken Starrs special council report. The irony is glorious.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,119 posts, read 16,115,879 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
Not sure why we wouldn't believe it. We may not even get to see it.
Congress voted to make sure it was released. And the POTUS encouraged the R's to vote that way.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
36,927 posts, read 18,885,575 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
my question:


IF there are sealed indictments do they remain sealed, do they become active, do they become void or ????
They remain in place, and can be unsealed as the situation changes, or ignored entirely.

THe indictments state what someone is charged with. No prosecutor worth his salt would draw one up if he didn't think he had evidence to support the charges and prove them in court.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 05:00 PM
 
21,758 posts, read 9,318,316 times
Reputation: 19215
Quote:
Originally Posted by LGR_NYR View Post
Dems didn't get what they wanted from Muller. They knew for YEARS they wouldn't get anything out of Muller. They were hoping that Trump would have tripped over his own dick by now and they could get him on something totally unrelated. Now the Dems excuses will come hard and fast. Dems are already seething at Muller.

I find it Ironic that Dems are screaming for the report to be made public but it can't be made public due to laws that DEMOCRATS put in place in the '90s by Janet Reno to protect Clinton from the full impact of Ken Starrs special council report. The irony is glorious.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
3,614 posts, read 1,723,198 times
Reputation: 2740
Quote:
Originally Posted by RowingFiend View Post
Really? How is Mueller's office going to prosecute these indictments when there will be no Office of the Special Counsel?
Maybe Muller will continue his work looking for the real colluders the same way OJ is still looking for Nicole Brown's killers.
 
Old 03-22-2019, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Boston
19,959 posts, read 8,856,694 times
Reputation: 18513
Tough times for Democrats, Trump being cleared just as they took over and were all amped up to start more investigations.

After 2 years of this nonsense, Americans have had enough "investigations" and want Congress to focus on their well-being, not Trump's. Doubt the Dems are smart enough to realize that and will continue down the path they started. Forget any meaningful legislation out of the House for the next year and a half. Let's watch them dig their own grave for 2020.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top