Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because he didn't have to. And because Mueller was running a political witch-hunt against the POTUS. No reason to sit down for an obvious perjury trap.
Add to that, by the time Mueller was asking Trump to answer questions, Mueller's team already knew their investigation was over, they knew there wasn't any collusion, none whatsoever.
Because he didn't have to. And because Mueller was running a political witch-hunt against the POTUS. No reason to sit down for an obvious perjury trap.
So your saying that Trumps above the law? so if you or I are under investigation then we don’t have to answer it ourselves?? And YES he does! Trap or no trap president Trump was supposed to answer the questions. Period. Perjury himself? How can he if he’s innocent?? So he is guilty??
And Muller was doing his job..you know unlike Trump.
You haven't read the report and Barr is an Individual 1 appointee who wrote against obstruction, therefore the report should be made public. It seems like the radical right has a difficult time releasing it. The House voted to make it public and most American's want it public. The right's state TV talking points or you won't change that either.
The House voted unanimously to release it so let's get the story straight instead of the partisan BS you want to push. And as of yesterday the Individual 1 stuff makes you look really stupid and childish.
You haven't read the report and Barr is an Individual 1 appointee who wrote against obstruction, therefore the report should be made public. It seems like the radical right has a difficult time releasing it. The House voted to make it public and most American's want it public. The right's state TV talking points or you won't change that either.
If there wasn't any collusion, and no obstruction of the investigation, why would a report about collusion be worth reading?
What you people need to worry about is the IG report that will be coming out now that the Mueller investigation is completed. That report will open up a new investigation into malfeasance and corruption within the Obama DoJ which started all of this crap.
If there wasn't any collusion, and no obstruction of the investigation, why would a report about collusion be worth reading?
What you people need to worry about is the IG report that will be coming out now that the Mueller investigation is completed. That report will open up a new investigation into malfeasance and corruption within the Obama DoJ which started all of this crap.
Fair enough you answered my questions. And I accept that.
Still my last question, if Hillary got away with her email scandal, why isn’t possible that Trump is guilty and just covered his tracks?
Hillary had a Democrat president with a supportive group at the head of the FBI and Justice department running interference for her and Trump didn't?
seriously. Hillary didn't cover her tracks. her crimes are clear and open. they were outlined and then they said "no crime" even though there were crime.
Trump didn't hide anything either. the difference is, Rod Rosenstien hired a bulldog, who hired a bunch of democrat lawyer bulldogs to go after Trump. they found nothing.
Isn't that the same magazine that said Hillary was too stupid to be president?...
unsecured server she wiped...unsecured phones, etc they beat with hammers....accidentally deleted 30,000 emails...can't remember anything
...and that's ok
You actually bring up an interesting point. Inquiring mind would like to know HOW SC Mueller was able to definitely discover it was those Russians that Hacked the DNC computers, when the DNC never allowed the FBI to look at them. As for .hillarys computers, all electronic devises ... they either “lost” or hammered to death. Servers gone also.
Never looked at those either.
somehow you think you said something funny.... LOL at not with.
I think you think you said something funny.
I was demonstrating the banality of your post.
You probably missed the sarcasm.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so if you or I are under investigation then we don’t have to answer it ourselves?? And YES he does! Trap or no trap president Trump was supposed to answer the questions. Period. Perjury himself? How can he if he’s innocent?? So he is guilty?? 
And I accept that. 
