Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-04-2019, 11:30 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409

Advertisements

I may be late to the party so I'm not sure if someone posted the WaPo already. WaPo backed up what the NYT posted and more.

Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team

Quote:
Barr told lawmakers that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove that the president obstructed justice.

But members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant.

“It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” said one person, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity.
Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.
Quote:
There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according to one U.S. official briefed on the matter.
Quote:
Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.
Quote:
The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.6692afad1a96

 
Old 04-04-2019, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,108 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18765
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
And that means you are claiming Rosenstein is an accomplice to clearing Trump . Yeah , right !

I can't help but notice all you Lefties forget to mention that the summary/memo was drafted by both Barr and Rosenstein .
and now Mueller is helping Barr and Rosenstein redact his document, one the these cubicle warriors here are claiming Barr is lying about. You can't make this stuff up. The level of stupid here has reached new heights. Really enjoying watching these dweebs turn on the spit.
 
Old 04-04-2019, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,108 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18765
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
I may be late to the party so I'm not sure if someone posted the WaPo already. WaPo backed up what the NYT posted and more.

Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team





https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.6692afad1a96
lmao the NYT has been wrong for 2.5 years, but keep reading it, over and over and over. Where are the names of these people besides in your head?
 
Old 04-04-2019, 11:42 AM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
No intent....next....
 
Old 04-04-2019, 11:47 AM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
I may be late to the party so I'm not sure if someone posted the WaPo already. WaPo backed up what the NYT posted and more.

Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team





https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.6692afad1a96


You mean they used the same anonymous sources? LMAO.....
 
Old 04-04-2019, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,188 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
So, Mueller would stand up and say that's not correct?
He will when he's supoenaed. Count on it.
 
Old 04-04-2019, 12:04 PM
AFP
 
7,412 posts, read 6,898,554 times
Reputation: 6632
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
And that means you are claiming Rosenstein is an accomplice to clearing Trump . Yeah , right !

I can't help but notice all you Lefties forget to mention that the summary/memo was drafted by both Barr and Rosenstein .
Well let's clear it all up all they have to do is make everything public that is legal.
 
Old 04-04-2019, 12:04 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
He will when he's supoenaed. Count on it.


Why would he wait?
 
Old 04-04-2019, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,188 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
yeah, and if there is evidence my grandpa killed JFK and destroyed evidence he could be in hot water. WTF!



All this from a NYT report of anonymous sources with no evidence and no details? LMAO!!!!


So now Trump, Barr and Rosenstein will be charged with obstruction based on a NYT report of anonymous sources and no evidence or details.....LMAO!!!
ALL media outlets use anonymous sources. You can find examples in any story on any network and in any publication that reports the news.

What was reported was an objection to Barr's mischaracteriztion of the facts in the report. I'll bet dollars to doughnut holes the real info has already been relayed to Nadler by these "anonymous sources".
 
Old 04-04-2019, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,188 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
you suspect? LMAO! and you based this on what? your opinion. Democrats are just in denial. They drank the kool aid for 2 1/2 years and now they look like fools just like Rachel Maddow.
If you have the facts, how about share them with us...?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top