Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:07 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
When the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment, they had muskets in mind.

Why not just allow only the guns that existed at the time? The "right to bear arms" doesn't necessarily mean the "right to bear ANY type of arms conceivable", does it?

I'd personally prefer guns to NOT be restricted at this point, just playing the devil's advocate.
There was a semi auto long gun when the 2nd was written. It was air powered.

I'm quite sure they heard of it at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:09 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
When the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment, they had muskets in mind.

Why not just allow only the guns that existed at the time? The "right to bear arms" doesn't necessarily mean the "right to bear ANY type of arms conceivable", does it?

I'd personally prefer guns to NOT be restricted at this point, just playing the devil's advocate.


They had the weapons in mind that were state of the art for the time and put the citizens on par with the military- that was the idea.


To the contrary, the founding fathers would be shocked at all the restrictions we have today, including bans on full auto weapons, grenades, tanks, ect.... that would put citizens on par with the military.


No one can envision new technology. However, the founding fathers could envision a tyrannical government attempting to place greater controls on the citizens, thus the need for weapons to equal that of the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:11 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,739 posts, read 7,610,204 times
Reputation: 15006
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
No one can envision new technology.
Really? When did that become true?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:21 AM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,140,056 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
They had the weapons in mind that were state of the art for the time and put the citizens on par with the military- that was the idea.


To the contrary, the founding fathers would be shocked at all the restrictions we have today, including bans on full auto weapons, grenades, tanks, ect.... that would put citizens on par with the military.


No one can envision new technology. However, the founding fathers could envision a tyrannical government attempting to place greater controls on the citizens, thus the need for weapons to equal that of the government.
Ah. Fair enough.

Hopefully it never comes to that though, because military technology has advanced so much (and gotten so expensive), the average civilian probably couldn't catch up nowadays.

It's a good principle though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
The title of the thread is wrong. NZ banned legally owned semi automatic sporting arms, so now only the government, and criminals can have them, thus putting the law abiding subject (serf) at more risk.


Will banning violent crime be next?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,073 posts, read 11,859,243 times
Reputation: 30347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach50 View Post
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is a good leader. Good for NZ!


https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/asia/...ntl/index.html


Meanwhile in the US... AR-15 rifles were used to commit every major mass shooting in the United States since the 2012 attack in an Aurora, Colorado movie theater and we do nothing.

Now how EASY was that, outlawing assault weapons???

We are so stupid. They are not. They saw the problem and basically fixed it. And the US families of victims still cry.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:34 AM
 
29,484 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14448
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
It took New Zealand less than a week to take action to ensure the slaughter does not continue unabated.

Meanwhile, back here in the U.S., 20 years after Columbine, there have been an average of 10 school shootings each and every year.

Oh, well, nothing we can do about it here.

Let the slaughter continue...

Wouldn't gun free zones and making murder illegal do that ? If not please explain why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:36 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron View Post
Now how EASY was that, outlawing assault weapons???

We are so stupid. They are not. They saw the problem and basically fixed it. And the US families of victims still cry.....
They did the same in NY and CA yet I can still buy one. I'm guessing NZ will have about the same luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 13,992,303 times
Reputation: 18856
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron View Post
Now how EASY was that, outlawing assault weapons???

We are so stupid. They are not. They saw the problem and basically fixed it. And the US families of victims still cry.....

Well, considering how much one can trust the US Government, considering what we have seen parts of the world do when civilians are unarmed, I don't we are stupid at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2019, 11:38 AM
 
29,484 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14448
Quote:
Originally Posted by max210 View Post
Let me help you quantify your bull ****.

30,000 Gun deaths a year in the US. US population at 324,059,091.......0.000000925% of the population dies from gun deaths.

65% (19,500) die of suicide by gun

15% (4500) are by law enforcement, both justified and not

17% (5100) are gang activity, drug related, and mentally ill people

3% (900) are accidental

Of those numbers, the 17% is what people consider gun violence, whether they had them legally or not and look at this

480 were in Chicago
344 in Baltimore
333 in Detroit
119 in Washington DC

basically 25% of what is called "gun violence" occurs in only 4 cities. And you can break it down further to where in those cities it's concentrated.

We are basically left with 3825 for the rest of the nation, or 75 per state if we break it down, in a country over over 300 million guns and 330 million people.
Facts that will be ignored by the emotionally driven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top