Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2019, 10:23 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,715 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985

Advertisements

Some peaceable New Zealanders are even turning in their guns already, thus removing the first line of defense against insane terrorists like the one who shot up the mosques in their own country. You know, the guy who took advantage of the fact that the police never arrive soon enough to stop the bulk of the killings, and the fact that the people who ARE there are seldom in a position to stop the murderer, them being unarmed.

Great call, NZ government. The next terrorist(s) will thank you.

Yet again, people fall into the trap of believing that govt can provide the best solution to this kind of problem... or ANY solution to it. How many more of them will die in service to this silly, long-debunked notion?

------------------------------------------------

https://www.lmtonline.com/news/artic...s-13696268.php

Shibani Mahtani, The Washington Post
Published 8:03 am CDT, Monday, March 18, 2019

WELLINGTON, New Zealand - Some rushed to their trusted online dealers and stores to stock up on semiautomatic assault rifles. Others unlocked their secure cabinets, picked up their firearms and turned them into police stations, no questions asked.

The estimated quarter of a million gun owners across this largely quiet, peaceful South Pacific country, many of them dedicated hunters, are bracing for what are likely to be significant reforms to New Zealand's firearm laws. Leaders have hinted the changes will impact the proliferation and availability of semiautomatic weapons in particular.

The changes, agreed to in principle by the country's coalition government Monday - just 72 hours after the deadliest act of gun violence in New Zealand history - put the country in line with others that have taken swift action following tragedy within their borders. Details of the changes will be announced within the week, and must be passed by parliament.

Last edited by Roboteer; 03-18-2019 at 10:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2019, 10:36 PM
 
5,717 posts, read 3,143,889 times
Reputation: 7374
It would seem that any one individual has the power to strip away everyone else's rights. This is why we place so much value on the bill of rights that leftists keep trying to erode away year after year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2019, 10:37 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,715 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985
Quote:
Originally Posted by neko_mimi View Post
This is why we place so much value on the constitution.
And why the liberals and other gun-rights-haters don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 01:21 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,715 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985
Quote:
https://www.news.com.au/world/pacifi...d809749d4fe555

The Australian terrorist began firing, spraying the people gathered like sitting ducks, calmly and methodically.

Mr Nasasrah, 63, was hit twice in his leg and slumped to the ground. Two men who were shot fell on top of him. “He (the gunman) approached us and opened fire (again). Both were killed and I felt them dying,” Mr Nasasrah said. “I felt their blood. I myself was shot and I thought ‘I’m dying’.”

He waited and prayed, staying as still as he could, for several minutes. He hoped that [the madman] would stop, run out of bullets or move on.

“Every time he stopped, I thought he was gone, but he returned over and over again,” Mr Nasasrah said.
Th madman kept coming back, firing again and again without letup, at his leisure. No police were there yet. And the people who WERE there, were incapable of firing back, stopping the madman, or otherwise defending themselves, being completely unarmed. Due mostly to the mistaken belief that "having a gun was bad, we shouldn't do it".

Fifty of those unarmed people are dead now, and dozens more injured. How many more shootings do we have to go through, before we start realizing that there are worse things than law-abiding people carrying a gun. Such as those law-abiding people leaving themselves open to a massacre with no way to defend themselves, dying while they awaited police who will usually take several minutes to get there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 01:26 PM
 
4,445 posts, read 1,448,182 times
Reputation: 3609
Quote:
Originally Posted by neko_mimi View Post
It would seem that any one individual has the power to strip away everyone else's rights. This is why we place so much value on the bill of rights that leftists keep trying to erode away year after year.
Indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,280,740 times
Reputation: 11032
New Zealand has more than 1.2 million civilian-owned firearms — about one gun for every four people, according to Small Arms Survey, which provides estimates for gun ownership around the world. That puts the country in the top 20 nations in the world for civilian gun ownership


https://www.vox.com/2019/3/15/182670...osque-shooting


Yes, clearly it was a lack of a "good guy with a gun" that caused this. That's why here at home in the US we've virtually eliminated mass shootings, because guns are so readily available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 01:32 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,715 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Th madman kept coming back, firing again and again without letup, at his leisure. No police were there yet. And the people who WERE there, were incapable of firing back, stopping the madman, or otherwise defending themselves, being completely unarmed. Due mostly to the mistaken belief that "having a gun was bad, we shouldn't do it".

Fifty of those unarmed people are dead now, and dozens more injured. How many more shootings do we have to go through, before we start realizing that there are worse things than law-abiding people carrying a gun. Such as those law-abiding people leaving themselves open to a massacre with no way to defend themselves, dying while they awaited police who will usually take several minutes to get there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
New Zealand has more than 1.2 million civilian-owned firearms — about one gun for every four people, according to Small Arms Survey, which provides estimates for gun ownership around the world. That puts the country in the top 20 nations in the world for civilian gun ownership


https://www.vox.com/2019/3/15/182670...osque-shooting


Yes, clearly it was a lack of a "good guy with a gun" that caused this. That's why here at home in the US we've virtually eliminated mass shootings, because guns are so readily available.
Didn't even read the post you're complaining about, did you?

Go back and read it again, s l o w l y. Paying particular attention to the last sentence in the first paragraph.

(yawn)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,280,740 times
Reputation: 11032
What I'm saying is that they don't have restrictive gun laws now. It didn't do anything to prevent the shooting. It's a fallacy that loose gun laws prevent gun violence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,210 posts, read 22,341,507 times
Reputation: 23838
The New Zealanders aren't giving up all their guns. They're giving up only their AR-15s.

Voluntarily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2019, 05:12 PM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
The New Zealanders aren't giving up all their guns. They're giving up only their AR-15s.

Voluntarily.
Then why a law?

All the esteemed city fathers need to do is roll out a dumpster in verey town square and let those that want to, turn them in. Likewise if one decides the AR-15 is the devil they can simply not purchase one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top