Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
there is NOT ONE THING humans can do to stop the natural glacial/interglacial cycles
we could go back to the stone age...before the discovery of fire, and it still wont stop the natural cycle....
what's worse is the liberals think the solution is more taxes
I respect your opinion on this issue but I know your not a climate scientist with published findings. The problem with America today is people think there opinions trump experts. For example I don't tell my plumber he is incorrect with something he is doing I let him work. The same is true with science letting people with no scientific background decide policy is ludicrous.
Shhh, if you speak reasonably like that, WK and the likes won't be able to spread their lies, and their projection of "radical".
Bottom line: This bill did not represent the core values of the left, and the votes prove that. Trump-ettes can't acknowledge that because the ONLY thing they have ever run on is bashing the other side. If they acknowledge it, they'd have to come up with solutions, and they have none.
Very true I have not seen the right come up with solutions to climate change.
Hopefully now all of the right wing kool-aid drinkers can stop saying that the Left wants to socialize America.
The left gave exactly ZERO votes in support of this nonsense, so maybe you all can turn over a new leaf and start spreading the truth. Your collective lying has gotten us Trump. R or D, we could do better.
You would be correct if they all voted against it -- but that is not what happened. They didn't take a position on it, one way or the other. They were cowards.
The GND isn't the only plan to address climate change it was to radical. They need to take a more pragmatic approach if they want to get people on board.
Actually it is, it's the only comprehensive plan to do so, which is precisely why it's being treated as such a big deal. Before this, literally no one was talking about a radical way to address climate change in congress. You say they need to take a more pragmatic approach. That's what they've been doing and it's lead us down an almost irreversible path. We need real change and it needs to happen now, not some "pragmatic" approach, which just a euphemism for doing nothing, basically.
Actually it seems to me that the spineless weasels are the democrats who voted "present" instead of going on the record one way or another for the GND. Those are the cowards.
No doubt.
All of the democrat front runners all in public are saying how great the GND is and how they support AOC yet when it comes time to put their money where their mouth was they wimped out.
If you're behind something grow a set and vote for it.
As far as I understand it it was just a vote to just decide to give it further examination. Maybe I'm wrong on that part, but it wasn't voting to put into law just yet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
