Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is a piece from Conway's OP-ED I posted yesterday. Read the whole OP-ED. It spells things out.
Quote:
But Mueller isn’t prone to cheap shots; he plays by the rules, every step of the way. If his report doesn’t exonerate the president, there must be something pretty damning in it about him, even if it might not suffice to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. And in saying that the report “catalogu[ed] the President’s actions, many of which took place in public view,” Barr’s letter makes clear that the report also catalogues actions taken privately that shed light on possible obstruction, actions that the American people and Congress yet know nothing about.
Perhaps he actually listened to the Barr Hearings and heard Barr say he would release as much of the report as he legally could.. What is the point in the drum beat when AG Barr has stated repeatedly that he will release as much as is LEGAL??
We're supposed to take what he said at face value? Seriously? The fact that the letter is so short and says so little is proof he's covering up a large portion of Mueller's report.
Barr said all of the right comforting words in his confirmation hearing but as soon as he sat in AG chair he has revealed his partisan bias.
They better release the report. Or somebody will leak it and it'll be the new Pentagon Papers.
Mitch McConnell just blocked another vote to make the Mueller Report Public, all we really have is what Trump's appointee Barr decided we should be allowed to see.
IF the right is confident of the "total exoneration" Trump claimed, why is Mitch once again playing the obstructionist?
We finally tossed Harry Reid for doing that crap. Now it is you guys turn.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd
What if there is more in that report than even the Dems would like the public to know and McConnell is holding it back as a matter of protecting the fragile nation?
Mueller had nearly 2 years, countless investigators and millions of dollars to dig up the dirt and I'm sure that in his excavating he came across more than just lumps of Trump but also pockets of questionable Democrat leavings.
I don't think anyone was clean when to came to this shame. What would the Democrats do if it was shown that Obama himself was complacent or worse directed and aided the false investigation in an attempt to sow discord across America?
What if the full report showed that Obama was the one that had colluded? It would rock our country to the core.
But seriously would anyone be surprised? DC is full of corruption and back door shenanigans.
I say let the truth, whatever it may be, come out. Only a weak nation would be unable to overcome any bad effects and rise above them and I don't believe we're weak. Let Washington prove no one is above the law.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA
Barr's letter only touched on two points: collusion with the Russian government and obstruction.
No mention of collusion with oligarchs?
No mention of collusion with Assange, WikiLeaks or Guccifer? Which was mentioned in Stone's indictments.
No mention whether or not Trump was compromised?
No mention of the Trump hotel deal?
No mention of emoluments? shady real estate deals? money laundering?
Barr's letter is far too short and omits a tremendous amount. Barr is hiding at least 90% of the Mueller report.
And considering his past OP/ED I'd say his objectivity is at best questionable.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby
Perhaps he actually listened to the Barr Hearings and heard Barr say he would release as much of the report as he legally could.. What is the point in the drum beat when AG Barr has stated repeatedly that he will release as much as is LEGAL??
Given Barr's unsolicited memo attacking Mueller's looking into possible obstruction by the POTUS that was submitted to the Trump administration, can his objectivity really be accepted without question?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby;54789275
OR ..... are you demanding that the US Attorney General break the LAW to satisfy the Hysterical Meltdown Crowd that is now the Definition in Dictionaries for [b
Sore Loser[/b]?
At this point terming any group a "Hysterical Meltdown Crowd" is pure nonsense as all we have is what was said by a man predisposed to question the investigation as evidenced by his past OP/ED who is also an appointee of one of those investigated who knows his predecessor was fired for doing the right thing and not playing his appointer's game.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
