The N.R.A.’s Strength Is Being Tested by a New Domestic Violence Act Provision

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

If you threaten a partner then you should have your guns removed, we have quite the history of people that were not locked up that ended up killing someone.

The threatened needs to prove the threat happened. Many times they are just mad that the other person left.

[NY_refugee87]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

If you threaten a partner then you should have your guns removed, we have quite the history of people that were not locked up that ended up killing someone.

So... take away guns... never mind the baseball bat, the knives, the hammer, and any other potential lethal weapon?

Smart.

I thought you were genuine in concern for others lives.

For if someone is that much a risk... why not take them away?

Afterall. It is individuals who are compelled by motive incentive and intent.
Not inanimate objects.

Cover blown.

[turkeydance]

this is tailor-made for the NRA to raise even more money and most likely WIN the debate.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Makes as much sense as a gun free zone. False safety.

As already stated, what makes a woman's life more important? Women threaten men all the time. Women are capable of firing a weapon or stabbing someone, or running them over with a vehicle.