Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It doesn't matter. The Debate is over. The Science is settled. It has been revealed as a HOAX and SCAM. Nobody cares anymore, as none of the predictions came true, nor will they unless nature (the Sun) decides they will.
The Man Made Climate Change proponents will just have to reveal themselves for what they are. Communists, and that is occurring nationally. The curtain has been pulled back.
Thus the reason people use the term climate denier, and a mere one post in. LOL
It doesn't matter. The Debate is over. The Science is settled. It has been revealed as a HOAX and SCAM. Nobody cares anymore, as none of the predictions came true, nor will they unless nature (the Sun) decides they will.
The Man Made Climate Change proponents will just have to reveal themselves for what they are. Communists, and that is occurring nationally. The curtain has been pulled back.
The debate is not over. We cannot pinpoint the exact damage. Since you don't understand what a communist is, I think it is safe to assume you don't understand the term 'prediction' either.
Now that is just nonsense...Yes, the climate has changed before humans, and in most cases scientists know why. In all cases we see the same association between CO2 levels and global temperatures. And past examples of rapidcarbon emissions (just like today) were generally highly destructive to life on Earth.
Proof that CO2 does not drive climate is to be found during the Ordovician-Silurian and the Jurassic-Cretaceous periods (approx 450 and 150 million years ago, respectively) when CO2 levels were greater than 4,000 ppm and about 2,000 ppm, respectively. If the IPCC AGW/ACC theory is correct, there should have been runaway greenhouse gas-induced global warming during those periods but instead there was glaciation.
Current CO2 level is slightly more than 400 ppm. Compare at will.
The scientific debate is pretty much over, human activity is contributing to changing climates. The extent can be debated but anybody denying it is a factor at all can safely be ignored. It might be inconvenient for then but they are wrong.
What of the professionals who debunked the denial that cigarettes were good for you? What of the professionals who are demonstrating opioid painkillers are addictive? Toss whatever scientist tell us into the bin of "paid for opinion," and just how do we go about deciding who to believe and why? I'm guessing your choice is based on some bias of yours rather than what most scientists believe and are making significant effort to PROVE to anyone who understands the science! Along with the rest of us who clearly don't.
Most scientists are about more than just making a buck in my opinion, or they would have chosen another profession to begin with.
They're just like the scientists who have debunked the pseudo-science scam of anthropogenic global warming now switched to anthropogenic climate change , and have shown that CO2 levels are not correlated with earth's climate change in either direction.
You know who to believe when it becomes very clear that some scientists are spewing false info/opinions. Such is the case with the anthropogenic climate change hoax-for-profit.
Wrong, the science is settled that climate change is real except in the mind of deniers who are sadly victims of minds polluted with junk science and greed. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious.
And asking you this as an honest question...do you think that people/companies aren't going to jump on this Climate Change bandwagon out of greed?
I can see this is yet another thread to Nowhereville, based largely on ignorance that fuels the penchant to express uninformed opinion as if we're the experts, with all sorts of impressive reason and logic that really has nothing to do with facts but everything to do with how we can go about ignoring or discrediting what we don't REALLY want to know or learn. Don't really have the time either, other than to express opinion about simple preconceived notions based on hardly more than that...
Can't blame most of us, because for most of us this is "way over our heads," but at least there are some of us who are not so impressed with ourselves to think any scientist can know better than we do. After all, they're all on the take! Except maybe that 3 percent getting their money from those very few poor companies who don't stand to gain from "cleaning up their act."
"We don't need no stinking scientists!" We've got corporate America to show us what's true. What's best!
No doubt time for me to sign off from this "think tank" of a forum...
I don't see that many people on here who are climate change deniers.
But there certainly are doomsday deniers, and I count myself among them.
ALL doomsday cults belong in the trash bin, automatically.
Weren't we supposed to run out of oil and other natural resources by now too? lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
, and have shown that CO2 levels are not correlated with earth's climate change in either direction.