Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:27 PM
 
29,520 posts, read 22,661,647 times
Reputation: 48242

Advertisements

Poor baby.

And from this negligence, the parents have a GoFundMe account that is nearing $40 thousand.

Disclaimer: I am NOT "anti-gun." I AM anti irresponsible gun owner.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-girl-d...081023526.html

Quote:
A young girl has died after she was shot in the head accidentally by her four-year-old brother.

Millie Drew Kelly, 6, from Georgia in the US, suffered the fatal bullet wound on Monday evening when she sat in a car with her brother outside their home.

The pair, starting their journey to the boy’s baseball game, were left alone briefly when their mother went to check under the car’s bonnet, Paulding County Sheriff’s Office said.

The boy then found the gun inside the car and accidentally fired it at his sister.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
The legal owner of that gun should be charged for negligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,416,761 times
Reputation: 8966
This is yet another example of the reality that the gun nuts do not want to acknowledge.

More guns is not always better.

Statistically, having a gun with children means a greater likelihood of an unintended death (accident, suicide, domestic disturbance, etc) like this than the chance of the gun being used to successfully protect the family from a threat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:53 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,854,052 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
This is yet another example of the reality that the gun nuts do not want to acknowledge.

More guns is not always better.

Statistically, having a gun with children means a greater likelihood of an unintended death (accident, suicide, domestic disturbance, etc) like this than the chance of the gun being used to successfully protect the family from a threat.

every time things like this come up, those of us that are truly responsible gun owners will tell everyone that the best way to prevent things like this are to EDUCATE the children in the house about guns. teach them gun safety at an early age, mostly to leave the guns alone at that age because of what they can do.


and then the gun grabbers come back with you shouldnt teach children anything about guns for what ever reason they can make up, usually a stupid one. as a result things like this keep happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
8,750 posts, read 3,120,999 times
Reputation: 1747
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
This is yet another example of the reality that the gun nuts do not want to acknowledge.

More guns is not always better.
Especially among cops.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Jeremy_Mardis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:56 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,316 posts, read 47,069,940 times
Reputation: 34087
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
This is yet another example of the reality that the gun nuts do not want to acknowledge.

More guns is not always better.

Statistically, having a gun with children means a greater likelihood of an unintended death (accident, suicide, domestic disturbance, etc) like this than the chance of the gun being used to successfully protect the family from a threat.
Statistically not putting a child into a vehicle drops their vehicle accident death rate to zero. Statistically, having stupid parents puts a child at risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,416,761 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
every time things like this come up, those of us that are truly responsible gun owners will tell everyone that the best way to prevent things like this are to EDUCATE the children in the house about guns. teach them gun safety at an early age, mostly to leave the guns alone at that age because of what they can do.

and then the gun grabbers come back with you shouldnt teach children anything about guns for what ever reason they can make up, usually a stupid one. as a result things like this keep happening.
As long as you can deal with facts and accept the reality of the well researched statistics I referenced, I have no problem with you teaching your children whatever you prefer about guns.

If you feel that in your household guns are not a threat because of the education you have conveyed about them, I'm not going to dispute that.

The general statistic holds, children are on average more threatened by a gun in the household than they are from a criminal who the gun might defend against.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,316 posts, read 47,069,940 times
Reputation: 34087
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The legal owner of that gun should be charged for negligence.
I'm pretty sure that parent wishes they weren't alive right now so how is tacking on charges going to help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,416,761 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
I'm pretty sure that parent wishes they weren't alive right now so how is tacking on charges going to help.
The parent deserves charges of at least negligence for sure.

The fact that you don’t feel they do tells me unequivocally that you are in the gun nut camp, as you don’t feel that possessing a firearm should ever open you up to criminal prosecution, even if through negligence someone allows children to kill themsleves with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2019, 04:05 PM
 
7,343 posts, read 4,370,223 times
Reputation: 7659
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The legal owner of that gun should be charged for negligence.
What if the legal owner legally loaned it to the negligent party?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top