Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can tell they didn't read the corruption AND obstruction about their morally bankrupt leader that accepted help from Russia to interfere in the election. We all know he didn't win the election with clean hands.
Considerably "cleaner" than the rapist's wife. Clinton "stole" the primary from Sanders, not Trump. Clinton was given debate questions ahead of time-not Trump. And finally-Clinton hired a foreign operative to provide "dirt" on her political opponent-not Trump.
For the folks that know this president is a corrupt con, note: The report explicitly states that the investigation did not clear the president.
Quote:
If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.
Quote:
Vol. II, Page D-3: During the course of the investigation, the Office periodically identified evidence of potential criminal activity that was outside the scope of the Special Counsel’s jurisdiction established by the Acting Attorney General. After consultation with the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Office referred that evidence to appropriate law enforcement authorities, principally other components of the Department of Justice and the FBI.
Considerably "cleaner" than the rapist's wife. Clinton "stole" the primary from Sanders, not Trump. Clinton was given debate questions ahead of time-not Trump. And finally-Clinton hired a foreign operative to provide "dirt" on her political opponent-not Trump.
LOL, I guess you missed the news where FOX gave Trump the debate questions in advance.
I guess you also missed the news that the dossier was started by the Republicans.
I guess you have failed to read the Mueller Report.
LMAO.
Considerably "cleaner" than the rapist's wife. Clinton "stole" the primary from Sanders, not Trump. Clinton was given debate questions ahead of time-not Trump. And finally-Clinton hired a foreign operative to provide "dirt" on her political opponent-not Trump.
The but....Clinton doesn't work. Go talk to the many Republicans that oversaw this current investigation about Hillary. Back to the corrupt con of a president that occupies the WH.
Quote:
On several occasions, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails setting up the June 9 meeting, suggesting that the emails would not leak and that the number of lawyers with access to them should be limited. Before the emails became public, the President edited a press statement for Trump Jr. by deleting a line that acknowledged that the meeting was with "an individual who [Trump Jr.] was told might have information helpful to the campaign and instead said only that the meeting was about adoptions of Russian children.
Barr's statement that Trump's level of cooperation with the SP was "unprecedented" isn't holding up too well, you have to wonder if he was reading the same report. I think we can all see why congress attempted to protect Mueller from being fired.
Last edited by Goodnight; 04-18-2019 at 03:56 PM..
We know this. We’ve known this since the day after his inauguration, when then-press secretary Sean Spicer gave an angry press conference insisting that Trump had record crowds to watch him get sworn in.
But it’s striking that the Mueller report — in which Spicer and his successor, Sarah Sanders, are peripheral figures at best — still manages to incidentally document at least seven instances of Trump’s press secretaries lying, four of them in the 24 hours after Trump summarily fired FBI Director James Comey on May 9, 2017.
The but....Clinton doesn't work. Go talk to the many Republicans that oversaw this current investigation about Hillary. Back to the corruption con of a president that occupies the WH.
What is your theory why there was a need for the Trump Tower meeting in June if Papadopolous and Page were in bed with the Russians?
I’m also trying to understand the long standing theory that these gentleman were approached about dirt already possessed versus a conspiracy to work together to illegally obtain dirt, there is a difference. After reading the two sections about Papadopolous and Page, the two persons who started the entire investigation, I see not one mention of a shred of evidence of a conspiracy. Why was this investigation allowed to go on after they found zero evidence from the two individuals that prompted the investigation, that’s a question that deserves an answer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Go talk to the many Republicans that oversaw this current investigation about Hillary. Back to the corrupt con of a president that occupies the WH.