Is it time to Red Flag Obama and keep him from following the example of the former president of Peru ? (guns, first amendment)

[lieqiang]

Originally Posted by phma

If there is any doubt its best to remove, without due process, a citizens rights, is the current thinking.

I disagree with your views that guns should be illegally seized from citizens, instead I respect the right to bear arms and due process provided by the US Constitution.

Gun grabbers like you don't respect the foundation of law and rights our forefathers established.

[DanArt]

ROTFL...................bribery.........

[r small]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

Good luck finding any logic or reasoning in this or any other of these nutball threads.

As near as I can figure it goes something like this: Firearms + Barack Obama = suicide in Peru. Trumpie logic.

[James Bond 007]

Originally Posted by phma

That statement could apply to the democrat platform.
However before us is this thread are specific issues connecting safety first gun policy and the Red Flag position of harmony. If there is any doubt its best to remove, without due process, a citizens rights, is the current thinking.
I wouldn't say Obama is retarded but the retarded do follow him and we don't want an epidemic of new gun violence.

Safety first !!!

How about this instead? We should red flag phma from starting any new threads so that he doesn't further embarrass himself.

[phma]

Originally Posted by James Bond 007

How about this instead? We should red flag phma from starting any new threads so that he doesn't further embarrass himself.

That would be attacking the first amendment.
You will never get away with that as long as there is the 2nd amendment.

Don't put the cart before the horse !!!
Learn the lesson that socialist and communist countries have learned. You must remove the guns from the population before you silence them.

[phma]

Originally Posted by DanArt

ROTFL...................bribery.........

ROTFL …………...Neck shot...………...more time on the target range. lol

[lieqiang]

Originally Posted by phma

That would be attacking the first amendment.
You will never get away with that as long as there is the 2nd amendment.

The guy who wants to take guns away from people based on his whims is now talking about others attacking amendments? What a joke.

[Oakformonday]

Originally Posted by phma

Is it time to Red Flag Obama and keep him from following the example of the former president of Peru ?

I say lets take the chance but some may see the need to Red Flag Obama just in case he has guns.



Peru’s former president shot himself in the neck as police came to arrest him over bribery, is now in critical condition
https://markets.businessinsider.com/...9-4-1028118693

Are you okay?

[burdell]

Originally Posted by lieqiang

You mean take away an American citizen's constitutional right to bear arms because the former president of Peru shot himself?

That is beyond retarded.

It IS! It's Trumpian!

But it is entertaining seeing tha man continue living rent-free in the heads of the Trumplings.

[James Bond 007]

Originally Posted by phma

That would be attacking the first amendment.

Well, City Data is a privately-owned forum and they could bar people from started threads just as easily as they can ban people altogether, if they wanted.