Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, that's right. Probably because people have seen pics of her son dressed as a girl for years, she decided to make an announcement.
"I thought she was a boy, too," she said. Then revealed that when her son was 3, he informed her that he was a girl. "So, there you go," she continued.
This dunce adopted a boy, then proceeded to emasculate him, buying him dresses and ballet slippers, to further her own agenda.
More insanity: The Fox article refers to the child as having been "assigned male" at birth--because then, of course, we can all buy into the lunacy of "re-assignment."
Stop drinking the Kool Aid, Fox. What we have here is a 7-year-old cross-dresser, thanks to a screwball mother who's been dressing him as a girl since he was 3. The world's gone mad.
Yes, that's right. Probably because people have seen pics of her son dressed as a girl for years, she decided to make an announcement.
"I thought she was a boy, too," she said. Then revealed that when her son was 3, he informed her that he was a girl. "So, there you go," she continued.
This dunce adopted a boy, then proceeded to emasculate him, buying him dresses and ballet slippers, to further her own agenda.
More insanity: The Fox article refers to the child as having been "assigned male" at birth--because then, of course, we can all buy into the lunacy of "re-assignment."
Stop drinking the Kool Aid, Fox. What we have here is a 7-year-old cross-dresser, thanks to a screwball mother who's been dressing him as a girl since he was 3. The world's gone mad.
Sorry, I'm not buying it. Kids don't even know what the hell they're saying at 3. And if the child were, say, 5, and said he was a girl, he should have been told, You're a boy. Go put your pants on.
What a crock of baloney. Charlize Theron just wants to be the LGBT queen--at the expense of a child.
Yes, that's right. Probably because people have seen pics of her son dressed as a girl for years, she decided to make an announcement.
"I thought she was a boy, too," she said. Then revealed that when her son was 3, he informed her that he was a girl. "So, there you go," she continued.
This dunce adopted a boy, then proceeded to emasculate him, buying him dresses and ballet slippers, to further her own agenda.
More insanity: The Fox article refers to the child as having been "assigned male" at birth--because then, of course, we can all buy into the lunacy of "re-assignment."
Stop drinking the Kool Aid, Fox. What we have here is a 7-year-old cross-dresser, thanks to a screwball mother who's been dressing him as a girl since he was 3. The world's gone mad.
Yes, that's right. Probably because people have seen pics of her son dressed as a girl for years, she decided to make an announcement.
"I thought she was a boy, too," she said. Then revealed that when her son was 3, he informed her that he was a girl. "So, there you go," she continued.
This dunce adopted a boy, then proceeded to emasculate him, buying him dresses and ballet slippers, to further her own agenda.
More insanity: The Fox article refers to the child as having been "assigned male" at birth--because then, of course, we can all buy into the lunacy of "re-assignment."
Stop drinking the Kool Aid, Fox. What we have here is a 7-year-old cross-dresser, thanks to a screwball mother who's been dressing him as a girl since he was 3. The world's gone mad.
Denying transgender does not mean it does not exist.
And obviously, from most of the replies to this thread, no loving parent would want their child to be transgender; it makes for a very hard life to lead for a very long future to come.
Denying transgender does not mean it does not exist.
And obviously, from most of the replies to this thread, no loving parent would want their child to be transgender; it makes for a very hard life to lead for a very long future to come.
Theron's agenda seems to be that there is no biological component to gender. This is wholly untrue by definition. And while there may exist one or more states of mind (and I say that, rather than psychological disorders) that may arise in which people identify with a gender (or lack thereof) other than that reflected via their biology, the two are objectively separate considerations (biological versus psychological). The issue lies within either the conflation of the two or the suggestion that one subsumes the other in totality. Both suggestions are simply wrong.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
