Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2019, 02:10 PM
 
8,168 posts, read 3,125,327 times
Reputation: 4501

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spottednikes View Post
I wouldnt want to hand over my credit card to someone that looks like a gangbanger. Someone with a tattoo or 2, or someone with a tasteful nose peircing...ok. would tip well for good service no matter what they look like. But i would probably pay cash, and not use a credit card if they look shady.
Interesting. So lets just hypothetically say that two waiters are working in a restaurant. One has on a long sleeve buttoned up shirt while the other has a short sleeve shirt. The one with the short sleeves have a number of tattoos. So you would feel more comfortable paying with a credit card via the waiter with the long sleeve buttoned up shirt compared to the one with the short sleeve shirt showing tattoos? Mean while, the guy with the long sleeve shirt on is hiding more tattoos under the shirt.

Wouldn't this be a case of a false sense of security?

Last edited by FC76-81; 04-30-2019 at 02:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:04 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,376,689 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You won't see visible tattoos or nose-rings in pretty much any "White-collar" job. Even the military has recently banned visible tattoos(when Obama was president).

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-...tattoo-policy/


If you're a young and impressionable person, take my advice, don't ruin your life. These degenerates are trying to lead you astray to justify their own stupidity.
Did you even bother to read your own link? That's a relaxing of the tattoo policy. Basically anything below the neck and above the wrists is now authorized.


..."Society is changing its view of tattoos, and we have to change along with that," Odierno said. "It makes sense. Soldiers have grown up in an era when tattoos are much more acceptable and we have to change along with that."...
(emphasis mine)





I work a white-collar job, I'm an IT project manager, and I have a full sleeve on my right arm. Guess what? My company has ABSOLUTELY NO RULES about tattoos - visible or otherwise. This is not some rinky-dink local IT company, either. We're a global company with ~10K employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2019, 08:13 PM
 
Location: NNJ
15,071 posts, read 10,096,890 times
Reputation: 17247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You said all that mattered to you is service. But you know a man with a swastika on his face would be a deal-breaker.
We are talking about a waiter in good standing with a restaurant and their business. We are talking typical tattoo'd people.. not outliers.



Swastika is a symbol of hatred. Hatred that can be expressed in their service and food safety.

Most people's tattoos are not a symbol of hatred... I doubt a restaurant owner would hire someone who had outward symbols of hate.


Similarly, I may not like Trump. But a waiter/waitress with a Trump supporting tattoo/clothing/hat would have no bearing on the treatment or respect I show towards them. I would still tip them based on their service.


Stop acting like you are of a higher moral standard and tough when obviously the concept of being open minded and understanding is beyond reach. If ink on skin is enough to sicken or disgust you, you have no standing to call someone else weak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 04:58 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 18 hours ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,163 posts, read 13,449,232 times
Reputation: 19454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You won't see visible tattoos or nose-rings in pretty much any "White-collar" job. Even the military has recently banned visible tattoos(when Obama was president).

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-...tattoo-policy/


If you're a young and impressionable person, take my advice, don't ruin your life. These degenerates are trying to lead you astray to justify their own stupidity.


Most countries outside of the US don't really tip that much, and wouldn't tip in respect of Take Aways, Fast food, Cafes, Coffee Shops and Casual Dining.

The only restaurant where you would leave a tip in most countries is in terms of fine dining, and in terms of fine dining you expect tattoos to be covered and staff to be immaculate in their presentation.

Tattoos are fine as long as they are covered up, they only generally become a problem if they are on a persons neck, face or hands.

In terms of piercings and jewellery there are hygiene and health and safety implications in many settings.

Such metal objects can carry germs and jewellery is usually not allowed when operating certain machinary.

In terms of the Army, you certainly wouldn't expect soldiers on ceremonial duties to have visible tattoos showing.

It's just common sense really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,206,249 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
Going by the dictionary definition, I think there are far more degenerate things that happen in this world, than porn
Regardless, the people in porn get "tipped"(IE paid) less for having tattoos. Why should waiters be treated any better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81 View Post
Tattoos were banned in the military primarily because of health risks.
The rule isn't no tattoos. The rule is no visible tattoos. Had the issue been health risks, they would have either banned all tattoos or only barred "new tattoos" when stationed overseas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Did you even bother to read your own link? That's a relaxing of the tattoo policy. Basically anything below the neck and above the wrists is now authorized.
The rule is no tattoos that can be visible while in uniform. As it relates to this thread, presumably the waiter has visible tattoos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I work a white-collar job, I'm an IT project manager, and I have a full sleeve on my right arm. Guess what? My company has ABSOLUTELY NO RULES about tattoos - visible or otherwise. This is not some rinky-dink local IT company, either. We're a global company with ~10K employees.
You don't work with customers. I highly doubt anyone who is in public-relations or who interfaces with customers or clients is allowed to have visible tattoos. Also, did you get the sleeve tattoo before or after you were hired(not to say that I trust your answer anyway)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
Swastika is a symbol of hatred. Hatred that can be expressed in their service and food safety.
I was using the swastika as an example because she claimed that her "only line" was the quality-of-service, and that she didn't care whatsoever about if, how many, and what kind of tattoos they had.

Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
Stop acting like you are of a higher moral standard and tough when obviously the concept of being open minded and understanding is beyond reach. If ink on skin is enough to sicken or disgust you, you have no standing to call someone else weak.
If you have a tattoo, I think less of you as a person. And I'm far from the only one. Even people who have tattoos think less of other people with tattoos(I posted a video a couple pages back in the thread).

If you have a tattoo, I will assume that you're a degenerate, and that you're going to use the money I hand you to buy drugs, alcohol, or something else wasteful and stupid. I would much rather give my money to a decent family-person with high-standards and morals.

When I'm tipping you, or hiring you, I'm doing you a favor, I'm helping you. And I would much rather help someone worthy of my help.

Imagine someone came up to you in the middle of the night at a gas-station, saying that his car ran out of gas down the street, and asked for $5 for gas. Would his appearance affect whether you would give him $5?

Obviously if he looked like an honest and decent person you would be more-likely to help him. If you look like a crackhead, the only people who want anything to do with you is other crackheads. Meth-heads love other meth-heads, and everyone else hates them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
Tattoos are fine as long as they are covered up, they only generally become a problem if they are on a persons neck, face or hands.
Yes, as long as no one can see your tattoo, no one knows you have a tattoo. If no one knows you have a tattoo, then in-effect you don't have a tattoo.


I find it hilarious that all the triggered people in this thread won't even defend face tattoos. Even the snowflakes know that face tattoos are literally retarded. But they delude themselves into believing other tattoos are just fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Huh. So the cops I’ve seen with tattoos, they’re degenerates too? Lol, your posts are hilariously absurd.
What is the personality-type of a police-officer? Could you be a police officer? Could your aunt be a police-officer?

IMHO, police tend to have a bully or tough-guy personalities, and them having tattoos doesn't surprise me. But even then, I'm pretty sure that police-departments have rules against visible tattoos(especially on the neck and face).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,206,249 times
Reputation: 4590
Hello guys, I'll be your waiter tonight. Would you like to hear our specials?

https://i.imgflip.com/10qw1k.jpg


The only thing more-annoying than the freaks, is the freak-apologists.

You know who you are.

Last edited by Redshadowz; 05-01-2019 at 06:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:26 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,083,837 times
Reputation: 7852
Of course not. What decent person would tip less because of a server's looks?

Their job as a waiter/waitress is to serve me my food and tend to any needs we have, not impress me with their fashion choices or cater their identity to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:37 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 18 hours ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,163 posts, read 13,449,232 times
Reputation: 19454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post

Yes, as long as no one can see your tattoo, no one knows you have a tattoo. If no one knows you have a tattoo, then in-effect you don't have a tattoo.


I find it hilarious that all the triggered people in this thread won't even defend face tattoos. Even the snowflakes know that face tattoos are literally retarded. But they delude themselves into believing other tattoos are just fine.


I agree in terms of if you are going to have a tattoo and want to work in a customer service role then don't have it somewhere prominant where you can't cover it up.

In terms of tattoos, some religious groups are against tattoos, Jews and some Christians usually cite Leviticus 19:28—”You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the Lord.”

The Jews were tattooed with a number by the Nazi's when they were moved to the concentration camps, which is another reason for them to dislike tattoos. Whilst the majority of Sunni Muslims believe tattooing is a sin, and there are other religious perspectives.

In Japanese culture, having tattoos is still linked to the Yakuza and organised crime, and traditionally the Japanese have looked down on tattoos, and in more recent decades gangs in many parts of the world use tatooos as gang symbols.

There are numerous other examples, and it should be noted that not everyone is comfortable around heavily tattooed indidividuals, and more especially those with tattoos on their face, neck and hands, whilst body modifications and jewellery have problems in relation to working in hygenic conditions and in terms of health and safety issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:40 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,968 posts, read 9,651,799 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spottednikes View Post
I wouldnt want to hand over my credit card to someone that looks like a gangbanger. Someone with a tattoo or 2, or someone with a tasteful nose peircing...ok. would tip well for good service no matter what they look like. But i would probably pay cash, and not use a credit card if they look shady.
Looks can often be deceptive. The boy next door look can also be capable of fraudulent, deceitful, and dishonest ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 06:43 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,376,689 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
The rule is no tattoos that can be visible while in uniform. As it relates to this thread, presumably the waiter has visible tattoos.

And waiters ain't soldiers. You still undermined your own attempt at a point - the military is becoming MORE, not LESS, permissive when it comes to tattoos. Also your claim was, in part: "Even the military has recently banned visible tattoos(when Obama was president)." Which is completely false. Tattoos below the wrist and above the neck have ALWAYS been a no-no, to the best of my knowledge. They certainly were when I enlisted in '98.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You don't work with customers. I highly doubt anyone who is in public-relations or who interfaces with customers or clients is allowed to have visible tattoos. Also, did you get the sleeve tattoo before or after you were hired(not to say that I trust your answer anyway)?

Bzzzzzt. Wrong, again. I'm sitting on site at a customer location right now, and have been here M-F every week for the past 2+ years. I see the customer, to include leadership, literally every day. Before this project I was on site at the same customer M-F for 7+ years.


I had a 3/4-sleeve when I got hired ~10 years ago. I only recently got extended down to the wrist. The point being my company still has absolutely no tattoo policy. If you want to hire young IT professionals, you'd better be prepared to deal with some tattoos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top