Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
You are making the claim, so I am asking you back it up. The word "advertising" was very cleverly removed in the OP, and replaced with a conspiracy theory about something else.
What it your claim based on other than pure speculation?
|
It doesn't make any difference to me whether the advertising was mentioned or not.
It's fishy that during a long campaign season that donations would be made to Buzzfeed around the same time as the Steele Dossier was being put out for consumption.
Buzzfeed has been operating since 2006. Three major election seasons have passed. Those are the only advertising funds they have received... ever.
If you look at the FEC database, the types of groups that get that amount of money go out and do the legwork to place advertising. Buzzfeed does not have a service that does that.
The article below says in 2012 ...
BuzzFeed adapts its branded content approach to political advertising, and Obama’s in
But when you look in the FEC database, there are no payments directly to Buzzfeed for advertising - which means a group was paid to go to Buzzfeed and do the digital advertising.
In this case mentioned in the OP - Buzzfeed was paid
directly - a large sum of money - to perform services which they do not do or to place ads at an outrageous cost. Does not pass the smell test.
I know I wasted my time on this with you - but I choose to go through some of the details every so often.