Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:47 AM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,660,332 times
Reputation: 20877

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
From what I can see -- guns aren't what they need -- the people of Venezuela need tanks --
Which is why the founding fathers would be shocked at the restriction of weapons currently enforced upon US citizens.

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to put the citizens on par with the military. With only availability of semi-auto weapons, the citizens are put at a tremendous disadvantage compared to the military. Thus, in its current implementation, weapons laws are far too restrictive from thier intended purpose in the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:47 AM
 
59,017 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14270
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
I also think that a large number of people have equated that responsible gun ownership is equivalent to "they're taking my guns". It's not. You have to have a license to operate a car, along with insurance. You have to give your identity to get a library book. Purchasing a firearm should at least have that level of requirement. Competency and knowledge.
" It's not. You have to have a license to operate a car, along with insurance. You have to give your identity to get a library book. Purchasing a firearm should at least have that level of requirement"

Did you fail Civics 101?

Driving is a PRIVILEGE granted by the STATE.

Owning arms is a RIGHT GUARANTEED under the 2nd amendment of the U.S. CONSTITUTION, "The RIGHT of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS shall NOT be INFRINGED" .

What part do you NOT understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:47 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,615,131 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
I also think that a large number of people have equated that responsible gun ownership is equivalent to "they're taking my guns". It's not. You have to have a license to operate a car, along with insurance. You have to give your identity to get a library book. Purchasing a firearm should at least have that level of requirement. Competency and knowledge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
OMG! Do you not understand even the basics of the Constitution? Please do some reading so you can avoid repeating such silliness again.
Well regulated means......well regulated, aka well functioning.

A well functioning militia would have :
- No criminals
- No children
- No habitual drunks / junkies
- No people physically incapable of handling a firearm
- No crazy people
- No people who have no idea how to handle a firearm (basic training)

Its common sense, which is why every militia and military makes sure the above are followed. It is also why the founders mentioned it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:48 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,264 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Sure guns would be a large plus for the current situation in Venezuela, nothing like escalation in the overthrow of a government.


Hope this ends peacefully for their people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,615,131 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to put the citizens on par with the military.
That is a myth. Nuclear weapons?

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 05-01-2019 at 06:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:51 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Well regulated means......well regulated, aka well functioning.

A well functioning militia would have :
- No criminals
- No children
- No habitual drunks / junkies
- No people physically incapable of handling a firearm
- No crazy people
- No people who have no idea how to handle a firearm (basic training)

Its common sense, which is why every militia and military makes sure the above are followed. It is also why the founders mentioned it.
You're welcome to redefine/interpret it anyway you want, but its irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:52 AM
 
59,017 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14270
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
Yep, and when we gave up our rights on full automatics, we existentially put a noose around our neck! Govt/ military/ law enforcement NOW have all the power, if it ever came down to it, the people would NOT be able to remove govt from power (that is truly frightening)!


Law enforcement claims they protect our rights as citizens, but Id bet anything, if it came down to it, they would protect govt ultimately, they are really the first line of defense.


We need to take back our rights to own full automatics with NO special license, or tax stamp, etc!!
"Yep, and when we gave up our rights on full automatics"

Full auto are still available. The gov't is NOT stopping you from buying one.

"Law enforcement claims they protect our rights as citizens, but Id bet anything, if it came down to it, they would protect govt ultimately, they are really the first line of defense.". I DISAGREE with your opinion.

Last edited by Quick Enough; 05-01-2019 at 06:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:53 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
That is a myth. Nuclear weapons?
Tanks,missles, bombs, nukes, fully automatic weapons, etc. there are no exclusions in the second if thats what you're trying to argue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:54 AM
 
45,221 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"Yep, and when we gave up our rights on full automatics"


Full auto are still available. The gov't is NOT stopping you from buying one.


"Law enforcement claims they protect our rights as citizens, but Id bet anything, if it came down to it, they would protect govt ultimately, they are really the first line of defense.'"i DISAGREE with your opinion.
No we just have to ask the psychopaths in govt for permission to own one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:56 AM
 
78,366 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Well regulated means......well regulated, aka well functioning.

A well functioning militia would have :
- No criminals
- No children
- No habitual drunks / junkies
- No people physically incapable of handling a firearm
- No crazy people
- No people who have no idea how to handle a firearm (basic training)

Its common sense, which is why every militia and military makes sure the above are followed. It is also why the founders mentioned it.
The problem is that many attempts to address things like that have been dishonest attempts to subvert the constitution.

For example, require licensing....but then restrict how they're given out to a trickle. Meanwhile the gang members still have their guns.

You and many others should fully recognize that these are not good faith efforts. They're often stolen from the old Jim Crow laws (hey look bullet taxes and egregious licensing fees!) or surely you've seen over the years attempts to end things like abortion by making the person wrestle a mountain of red tape until they can't get one. But it's not a ban! Wink Wink!

So, what you are describing as reasonable laws have been bait and switch attacks in the past and thus gun owners are uninterested in the latest ploy.

I ask if you've ever seen someone try to pass a law as an underhanded attempt to achieve a different goal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top