Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:02 PM
 
5,051 posts, read 3,560,674 times
Reputation: 6512

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
The only thing Jerry Nadler should be doing is replacing the urinal cakes in the men's room. He is nothing more than a vindictive worthless dirt bag and the perfect example of why Democrats should never be in charge of anything.

Well I hope you are a millionaire because if not and the massive display of incompetence, the gigantic tax cut for the wealthy and huge run up of the national debt don't concern you then your head is simply too far under the sand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:06 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,562,722 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
He said Barr’s summary was accurate

He only complained about tje media coverage, whatever that means
Lol
Lies like this would be more effective if the source document disproving it wasn’t readily available for the public to see for themselves. You must think your fellow posters are the dumbest people on Earth if you think they are going to buy this nonsense just because you repeat it over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:07 PM
 
51,606 posts, read 25,633,677 times
Reputation: 37792
Love the Banana Republicans' wee insults that always seem to involve bodily functions of some sort -- urinal cakes, butt hurt (always a favorite ), etc.

It's been years since I've heard anyone talk like this.

Last edited by GotHereQuickAsICould; 05-01-2019 at 05:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:09 PM
 
51,606 posts, read 25,633,677 times
Reputation: 37792
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57 View Post
I don't know, when she asked Barr, the Attorney General of the United States of America, if he thought it was OK for the President to tell his White House council to lie (Don McGahn) Barr couldn't/wouldn't answer. When she asked if he thought it was OK for the President to threaten a witness's family (Cohen) Barr couldn't/wouldn't answer.

That's where we're at kids....
The answers seem so clear to me.

Wonder why the head of the U.S. Dept. of Justice has trouble with such questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:12 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,393,664 times
Reputation: 6406
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Mueller carries much more weight with the American people than Barr does. Mueller will win the court of public opinion. And nobody knows really what the man is going to say or more importantly how he will contextualize His report.
Yes, Mueller spends 2 years investigating yet Barr didn't even review the evidence on obstruction, he holds a press conference to reiterate the president's talking points, lies about knowledge of Mueller's review of his summary conclusion and he mischaracterizes Mueller's report. No wonder he doesn't want to testify tomorrow, the Committee will continue to expose him for acting as the president personal attorney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:14 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,393,664 times
Reputation: 6406
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Lies like this would be more effective if the source document disproving it wasn’t readily available for the public to see for themselves. You must think your fellow posters are the dumbest people on Earth if you think they are going to buy this nonsense just because you repeat it over and over again.
Could it be Russia? They are taking a play right from the president's book.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:20 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,485,141 times
Reputation: 5452
Except, they still give the same false info over and over as they don't seem to live by facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:31 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,068,295 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Mueller carries much more weight with the American people than Barr does. Mueller will win the court of public opinion. And nobody knows really what the man is going to say or more importantly how he will contextualize His report.
Until he disappoints libs when he doesn’t give them what they want
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:32 PM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,467,453 times
Reputation: 12310
He's not going to testify tomorrow. It's highly inappropriate for the Dems to sic their lapdogs (staffers) on him.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ittee-n1000951
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 05:32 PM
 
46,191 posts, read 26,946,757 times
Reputation: 11080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
It sure appears that Mueller left this up to congress, not Barr and if you read through the report there were some holes in the investigation.



Wrong, mueller could not make the decision, so barr made it for him.....not sure why that is so hard to understand?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Plenty of omissions, destroyed emails, inability to get testimony from foreign nationals, no testimony from the president and a lack of memory.

Destroyed emails, are you talking about hillary?



The foreign national showed up, comey/mueller ran the other way....







Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
But in the end Barr made his decision with his promo a few weeks ago and decided this was his "baby".

Because mueller punted, he and comey had no right to make the decisions they did, which barr clearly mad that distinction in the his testimony.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Remember when everyone said that if Mueller had a problem with Barr's summary he would have said something. well evidently he did. So are you going to ignore him.

Do you remember when barr said, come look at what I'm about to present....and mueller said no? Evidently you are willfully ignoring that, Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top