Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:11 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,937 posts, read 49,032,812 times
Reputation: 54963

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
These are lies.

The full report was not released. About a third of it was blacked out.

Even that much was only released after Barr spent a month misleading Congress and citizens about what was in it.
.
And that's a lie.

About 1% of the report was blocked out. The Entire report not Blocked out is available for the Judiciary Committee to go read in a secure room.

You know how many Democrats have taken the time to go read it?

ZERO ! NONE ! NADA ! The report is available in it's entire unredacted format.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:12 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,252,383 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
You obviously didn’t read (or couldn’t understand) the Report. Mueller never concluded that he couldn’t find a crime. He stated that he found numerous instances where Trump’s actions may have constituted a crime, yet stopped short of making an absolute conclusion and indictment because OLC regulations prevented him from doing so. He then expressly left the drawing of that conclusion to Congress now or a prosecutor after Trump left office. He never punted to Barr.

You see, your nonsense and obfuscation about what Mueller did and did not conclude simply won’t work on some like me who has actually read the report. Simply repeating Mueller couldn’t find a crime or Mueller punted to Barr will only work on low information people who haven’t read it.

No, you read what you want to read from the report. Mueller played both sides of the fence on obstruction and at the end refused to make a call. He punted.

This is where you are full of caca. Mueller doesn’t report to Congress. By law, that report didn’t have to go public. He reports only to the DOJ. His job and powers were to find crimes and indict in his report to the DOJ. He doesn’t outrank Barr or Rosenstein. Mueller doesn’t make the call how the report goes public or if it does. He doesn’t even report to Congress or make any recommendation to Congress, that’s not his call.

If Barr didn’t want to make the report public by law, Congress had no say in it. This is call separation of powers, maybe you should read the constitution once in a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:14 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,252,383 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
And that's a lie.

About 1% of the report was blocked out. The Entire report not Blocked out is available for the Judiciary Committee to go read in a secure room.

You know how many Democrats have taken the time to go read it?

ZERO ! NONE ! NADA ! The report is available in it's entire unredacted format.

True. They don’t care. This is not about the law, it’s political.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:14 AM
 
58,761 posts, read 27,092,933 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
How did trump and his campaign accept help from Russia?

"The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, [former President Bill] Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from interests linked to Uranium One, which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...120-story.html

And no Special Counsel DEMANDED by the dems in Congress!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:15 AM
 
51,619 posts, read 25,691,824 times
Reputation: 37806
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
The Mueller Report also details the myriad ways Trump’s campaign was open to accepting Russian help. It’s all there in Volume I. I can’t fathom why people are so staunchly wedded to their opinion about the contents of a document that they obviously haven’t read.
Easy to understand why those posting from St. Petersburg would persist in lying about Trump's campaign accepting Russian interference in our election, but why would American citizens believe and spread these lies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:15 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,381,876 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
So aside from the usual insults and suggestions to shut up, what is your opinion of a 2020 candidate seeking and accepting help from the Chinese government?
Nope, not going to entertain your delusions. Funny this word "accept" has appeared....

So SICK of you leftists!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:22 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,937 posts, read 49,032,812 times
Reputation: 54963
The truth is about to start coming out. Over the next 60 days we are going to see much more of these.

The real Criminals are about to be exposed.

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/...43778035109888
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:23 AM
 
46,222 posts, read 26,988,484 times
Reputation: 11092
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
The Mueller Report also details the myriad ways Trump’s campaign was open to accepting Russian help. It’s all there in Volume I. I can’t fathom why people are so staunchly wedded to their opinion about the contents of a document that they obviously haven’t read.


I have read it and have come to the same conclusion as barr...


You see there is a thing called a threshold or beyond a reasonable doubt that has to be met for there to be a crime. Now, you can say well because he did not met that threshold or beyond reasonable doubt does not mean he did not do anything....well, that's why we have the beyond a reasonable doubt and threshold....


I cannot fathom why people want to do harm to people when they have not meet the requirements of the law? I don't care if you don't like it...to bad....


I did not like it when Obama said (paraphrasing) tell Dmitri Medvedev I'll have more leeway when I'm elected again...but guess what, that did not meet the requirements of the law...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:23 AM
 
58,761 posts, read 27,092,933 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Anyone that read the report that laid out more than 215 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia knows better than to take anything from the above statement as a fact.
"Contacts" does NOT mean COLLISION!

Are you now claiming you know more then 16 DEM lawyers, most who DONATED to hillary's campaign and a couple even worked for her, could NOT FIND EVIDENCE OF COLLISION to indict, but YOU CAN?

If THEY couldn't find it, I am sure as hell you CAN'T.

How about this? Why haven't all you with TDS NOT talked about hillary's "contacts" with Russia for the 2 years the investigation went on? Your COMPLETE SILENCE says it ALL!

And ALL of ts went on DURING OBAMA'S ADMIN.

"The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, [former President Bill] Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from interests linked to Uranium One, which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...120-story.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2019, 05:27 AM
 
46,222 posts, read 26,988,484 times
Reputation: 11092
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Easy to understand why those posting from St. Petersburg would persist in lying about Trump's campaign accepting Russian interference in our election, but why would American citizens believe and spread these lies?


It's also amazing that people (that hate trump) who spread lies about reading the Mueller report when it's clear they cannot read, much less comprehend. Why would American citizens spread lies, when they know they cannot read?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top