Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I did. An 11-year-old would qualify for an exemption. There is no MD in the US that will put their professional medical license and personal property on the line by claiming that an 11-year old can carry a pregnancy to full term without any serious health risks.
STOP arguing about complete nonsense. You all sound like a bunch of brainless, ignorant alarmists. It's just as bad as the anthropogenic climate change hoax.
You should be preaching this to your conservative brethren. They're the ones who want to force this child to carry this pregnancy to term. I notice how you keep avoiding that truth so you can go after "lefties."
You should be preaching this to your conservative brethren. They're the ones who want to force this child to carry this pregnancy to term. I notice how you keep avoiding that truth so you can go after "lefties."
If that were true, WHY is there a medical exemption for which an 11-year-old would clearly qualify?
It IS true. Your fellow conservatives want to force this child to carry the pregnancy to term. So go preach at them. The "lefties" here don't need your preaching because we are in full support of allowing this child to have an abortion.
It's the righties who are not. Why aren't you telling them to "stop the brainless stupidity"?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,454 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10433
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Like I said, any sane doctor's professional opinion is that an 11-year-old carrying a pregnancy to term is a direct threat to that 11-year-old's life. She therefore qualifies for the medically necessary exemption.
You nailed it.
Included in that bill...
"SECTION 1. That sections 2317.56, 2919.171, 2919.19, 2919.191, 2919.192, 2919.193, and 4731.22 be amended; sections 2919.191 (2919.192), 2919.192 (2919.194), and 2919.193 (2919.198) be amended for the purpose of adopting new section numbers as shown in parentheses; and new sections 2919.191 and 2919.193 and sections 2919.195, 2919.196, 2919.197, 2919.199, 2919.1910, 2919.1912, 2919.1913, and 5103.11 of the Revised Code be enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 2317.56. (A) As used in this section: (1) "Medical emergency" has the same meaning as in section 2919.16 of the Revised Code. (2) "Medical necessity" means a medical condition of a pregnant woman that, in the reasonable judgment of the physician who is attending the woman, so complicates the pregnancy that it necessitates the immediate performance or inducement of an abortion."
<bbm>
Quote:
This is a non-issue and lefties are asserting complete nonsense, as usual.
Flat out false. There's an exemption for medically necessary abortions.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with your fellow conservatives wanting to force this child to carry to full term. You know it. I know it. The conservatives who want to force this child to have a child know it. They care nothing about the exemption you keep talking about to avoid the reality that your side advocates for force-birth, even when it involves a raped child.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with your fellow conservatives wanting to force this child to carry to full term. You know it. I know it. The conservatives who want to force this child to have a child know it. They care nothing about the exemption you keep talking about to avoid the reality that your side advocates for force-birth, even when it involves a raped child.
Already debunked by the fact that the medical necessity clause is included in the law.
Stop being deluded by mindless "feelz" and start using critical/logical thinking skills for a change.
The conservatives in this thread disagree with you. They believe this child should be forced to give birth. I understand that you don't want to admit that about your comrades, but everyone reading here knows it's true.
Like I said, any sane doctor's professional opinion is that an 11-year-old carrying a pregnancy to term is a direct threat to that 11-year-old's life. She therefore qualifies for the medically necessary exemption.
You nailed it.
Included in that bill...
"SECTION 1. That sections 2317.56, 2919.171, 2919.19, 2919.191, 2919.192, 2919.193, and 4731.22 be amended; sections 2919.191 (2919.192), 2919.192 (2919.194), and 2919.193 (2919.198) be amended for the purpose of adopting new section numbers as shown in parentheses; and new sections 2919.191 and 2919.193 and sections 2919.195, 2919.196, 2919.197, 2919.199, 2919.1910, 2919.1912, 2919.1913, and 5103.11 of the Revised Code be enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 2317.56. (A) As used in this section: (1) "Medical emergency" has the same meaning as in section 2919.16 of the Revised Code. (2) "Medical necessity" means a medical condition of a pregnant woman that, in the reasonable judgment of the physician who is attending the woman, so complicates the pregnancy that it necessitates the immediate performance or inducement of an abortion."
Quote:
This is a non-issue and lefties are asserting complete nonsense, as usual.
Exactly!!!!
The sad fact is that US society is becoming increasingly polarized because there are people with critical/logical thinking skills on one side, and only those who are limited to knee-jerk "feeling" and "emoting" on the other.
The conservatives in this thread disagree with you. They believe this child should be forced to give birth. I understand that you don't want to admit that about your comrades, but everyone reading here knows it's true.
This thread is about the law, even in a very pro-life state. It provides a medically necessary exemption for which an 11-year old would qualify. You have no point. You can only bluster impotently.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You nailed it.
