Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you admit your to lazy to look up in this thread!!...
Again, I'm done discussing this with you. Anyone who fails to understand that country A (USA), attacking country B (Iraq), means that country B (Iraq) could consider that an act of war, is someone not worth discussing the issue with.
I thought people here in this country were educated enough to understand that an unprovoked attack, can mean an act of war, and thats exactly what President Clinton did. Obviously not everyone here understands that.. ie, back to the demise of our education system..
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,298 posts, read 54,154,649 times
Reputation: 40621
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
So you admit your to lazy to look up in this thread!!...
No, I was merely trying to point out your inability to correctly spell speeches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Again, I'm done discussing this with you. Anyone who fails to understand that country A (USA), attacking country B (Iraq), means that country B (Iraq) could consider that an act of war, is someone not worth discussing the issue with.
Just can't seem to get a handle on the topoic, can you?
Bush told an OUTRIGHT LIE.
You have yet to cite any in the Clintons' speeches.
This is the second time you claimed you were done, any chance you'll make good on that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
I thought people here in this country were educated enough to understand that an unprovoked attack, can mean an act of war, and thats exactly what President Clinton did. Obviously not everyone here understands that.. ie, back to the demise of our education system..
And I thought people were educated enough to understand the difference between poor decision making and outright lies. Some obviously aren't.
Here's another example of an outright lie being accepted by you as fact.
In 1998 the IAEA clearly stated that Iraq was six to 24 months away from developing a nuclear weapon.
Right, this was the rationality in President Clinton attacking, now being excused as "poor decision making" by some, and why the change in the US official policy to "overthrow of the Iraqi government".
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,298 posts, read 54,154,649 times
Reputation: 40621
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Right, this was the rationality in President Clinton attacking, now being excused as "poor decision making" by some, and why the change in the US official policy to "overthrow of the Iraqi government".
STILL whining about Clinton ?
Try to grasp the very simple concept------OUTRIGHT LIES
Something you have yet to factually attribute to Clinton
You'd apparently rather make pissy, unfounded comments about drug use.
But personally, I have less of a problem, with someone lying about their sleazy, cheatin' sex life than I do with lying about reasons for war, just my own, personal opinion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.