Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Originally Posted by Partial Observer I don’t think this means what you think it means.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson gave the prosecutors until Monday to “submit unredacted versions of those portions of the report that relate to defendant Stone and/or ‘the dissemination of hacked materials.”
Originally Posted by Partial Observer ”Judge Jackson would review the material in private to see if it is relevant to the case and to decide whether Stone and his defense team will have access to the material.”
I think it means the judge will review the materials herself and then decide whether to give them to Stone’s defense team.
It means they were fighting to keep information from Roger Stones defense team, that can clear him and exactly what the accusations are, he is defending.
They were going to deny him that.
Who Framed Roger Stone?
It means the prosecutors are planning to use parts of the report to support their charges against Stone and thus are going through the standard discovery process of disclosing those parts to the defense team. This is what it actually means, not what it "means" from the perspective of a conspiracy addled mind.
It means the prosecutors are planning to use parts of the report to support their charges against Stone and thus are going through the standard discovery process of disclosing those parts to the defense team. This is what it actually means, not what it "means" from the perspective of a conspiracy addled mind.
Nah, the standard discovery process usually doesn't require a court order to force compliance.
It means they were fighting to keep information from Roger Stones defense team, that can clear him and exactly what the accusations are, he is defending.
They were going to deny him that.
Who Framed Roger Stone?
It doesn't mean that at all. The defense is probably taking a swing at finding something in the redacted portions to hang some conspiracy theory stuff out there and cloud up the waters. The prosecution is obligated to provide any exculpatory evidence that they have and probably already did so. Is this redacted stuff to be viewed in camera?
Maybe Mr Stone, upon seeing the redacted parts, can now tell us how many charges Trump and his family are likely facing from the SDNY after he leaves office.
Maybe Mr Stone, upon seeing the redacted parts, can now tell us how many charges Trump and his family are likely facing from the SDNY after he leaves office.
Pay attention...
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson gave the prosecutors until Monday to “submit unredacted versions of those portions of the report that relate to defendant Stone and/or ‘the dissemination of hacked materials.”
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
