Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2019, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,839 posts, read 26,236,305 times
Reputation: 34038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Nadler should go to the grand jury and beg them, for the release of their redacted documents.
Or Nadler could bring a bill to the house floor, to amend the rules to allow grand jury info to be released.
Nonsense, Barr should realize he is the Attorney General for the people of the United States, he is not Trump's water boy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2019, 12:03 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
First, there was no source. Then Sarah Sanders was a source. SMH No source is actually the better source of the two.
Someone deleted them all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 12:04 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Nonsense, Barr should realize he is the Attorney General for the people of the United States, he is not Trump's water boy.
Nadler is a rookie compared to Barr.
Nadler got worked by Barr.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,861 posts, read 26,482,831 times
Reputation: 25754
Just more proof that all these demands for the release of the "unredacted" report are just more of a smokescreen for an increasingly desperate and pathetic Democratic party. They don't WANT the unredacted report released-simply because it will point yet again to nothing done wrong by the Trump admin. But they do want to keep up the faux outrage of proof of "obstruction". After the Russian Collusion hoax finally was put to bed, they are desperate for anything to feed the media to keep the outrage going. They demand the release of an unredacted report-that they know can not be legally released-just for smoke and mirrors. If they actually thought there was any substance they would be reviewing the report as the OP presented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 10:39 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
First, there was no source. Then Sarah Sanders was a source. SMH No source is actually the better source of the two.
What's "SMH"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 11:09 AM
 
1,991 posts, read 899,366 times
Reputation: 2627
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Now CNN is running it.


https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/10/polit...ort/index.html


Washington (CNN)

None of the Democrats who have been provided access to a less-redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report have gone to the Justice Department to read it,
Your thread title said “Full Report” and now you are saying “less redacted report” which you knew to be the case when you posted this thread. This thread started out as duplicitous trolling and should be locked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 12:00 PM
 
4,344 posts, read 5,795,207 times
Reputation: 2466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
What's "SMH"?
Shake my head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2019, 12:31 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
sometimes i get the feeling my posts are invisible
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2019, 03:59 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
sometimes i get the feeling my posts are invisible
That is what happens when the truth is spoken. There is little to debate with the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2019, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,692,117 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC23 View Post
Your thread title said “Full Report” and now you are saying “less redacted report” which you knew to be the case when you posted this thread. This thread started out as duplicitous trolling and should be locked.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top