Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sought-after parts of the Mueller investigation may be made public this week, thanks to a federal judge who's taken an unusual approach in former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn's case.
Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court in DC set a Friday deadline for the Justice Department to make public unredacted portions of the Mueller report that pertain to Flynn, plus transcripts of Flynn's calls with former Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and of a voicemail during which someone connected to Trump referenced Flynn's cooperation.
Taken together, the judge's orders look like a shortcut to transparency in a moment of executive branch stonewalling.
Each of the documents, once made public, could bring revelations about Mueller's work. The transcripts alone could answer lingering questions about what exactly Flynn said to the Russians that caused so much concern among US intelligence and how a message that factored into the obstruction of justice probe into President Donald Trump played out.
Given Barr's new super powers, I wonder if he'll try to halt the judge's orders?
Flynn is probably going to walk free as more documents are declassified, especially exculpatory evidence (interrogation notes) that were hidden. Unless the Deep State conspirators destroyed it.
Isn't it amusing how the Dems demanded a totally unredacted Mueller Report despite it being illegal but now that Trump is allowing transparency by having Barr declassify docs, they call it a 'cover up.'
A Transparent Cover Up.
It's not transparent when only some things are allowed to be transparent.
Flynn is probably going to walk free as more documents are declassified, especially exculpatory evidence (interrogation notes) that were hidden. Unless the Deep State conspirators destroyed it.
Isn't it amusing how the Dems demanded a totally unredacted Mueller Report despite it being illegal but now that Trump is allowing transparency by having Barr declassify docs, they call it a 'cover up.'
A Transparent Cover Up.
You mean, since Barr is now empowered to cherry-pick.
You have a weird definition of transparency.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
