Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:28 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 21 days ago)
 
27,631 posts, read 16,111,637 times
Reputation: 19026

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Even Fox is finally getting on board.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-ne...s-trump-thinks
He simply reiterated whatMuehler said, insufficient evidence. Muehler also said he would ignore subpoena to testify. Its over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:29 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,791,579 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Nobody is even mentioning the Russian interference that Mueller described. This should concern the entire country, even the president.
Trump's attitude all along has been, "Russia who?" SMDH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:30 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,161 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
The same 538 website that gave no chance of trump wining, that website?

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...tion-forecast/

Oh, look it is....71% hillary and 28% trump...how'd that work out for ya....LOL....
28% chance of winning is not the same as "no chance" of winning. You know how probabilities work, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:32 PM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,071,273 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
28% chance of winning is not the same as "no chance" of winning. You know how probabilities work, right?

Point went straight over your head......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:34 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,949,556 times
Reputation: 33174
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
It is really obnoxious when they compare it to the pitfalls and fallout the Republicans dealt with surrounding Clinton's impeachment. They are comparing Trump's treacherous un-American actions to lying about consensual oral sex.
That's because they would rather have a traitor in office than a Democrat. They got their wish. If Trump were any farther up Putin's ass he would know what kind of tp he uses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:36 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,582,161 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Point went straight over your head......
You were denigrating 538 as being unreliable by claiming it gave Trump "no chance" of winning when it gave him a 28% chance of winning. Its not my fault if you are incapable of making a broader point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:40 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,447,916 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
That's because they would rather have a traitor in office than a Democrat. They got their wish. ...
Agreed.

Ironically, from reviewing the kind of topics near and dear to Trumpies it is obvious that most of them are just confused Democrats themselves, claiming everyone else is a RINO. That is the power of propaganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:41 PM
 
352 posts, read 518,290 times
Reputation: 246
I've been holding back on saying this, because I wasn't ready to say it, but I do think its time to start looking into impeachment.

If you don't believe that, you're being political and partisan, there's no other way around it.

Mueller stated that the reason the President wasn't charged with a crime is because you can't charge a sitting POTUS with a crime. The correct course of action is set forth in front of us, and that is impeachment proceedings. We have a system of checks and balances and they must be used to protect our democracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:43 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,447,916 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
I think this is a prelude to the IG report coming out that is going to totally crush dems & the deep state.
This post gets the nomination ... for one of the most absurd suggestions on a thread full of absurd suggestions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2019, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,094 posts, read 8,995,406 times
Reputation: 18734
Trump won, Dems lost.

accept it. He's going nowhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top