Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL — Dershowitz has been protecting Mueller for the most part, but tonight he just came out totally disgusted by Mueller’s orchestrated partisan travesty today.
And sadly we all know what will happen. Trump will resign and get pardoned by Pence and if that won't happen the Republicans in the Senate will not no. It isn't worth it and better to have it go to the real judges, the American people. I sure hope we get Biden or Bernie because they are Rottweilers while Trump is small yapping chiluaua.
Why did Mueller not answer questions since he's making a statement.
Question his motivation...This is not how our justice system operates.
You don't push hearsay, leave a cloud over someone's head.
There was no collusion, no obstruction
Mueller knows and is scared of the storm to come.
Dept. of Energy Documents (Uranium One) are being looked at by Durham and Barr to see the influence Russia had on the USA, politically in pay-to-play.
Does It matter to Republicans or Trump supporters who aren't Republicans, nope. To them they think Mueller is in the Cabal with Hillary, Podesta, Obama, Comey, et. all.
Yeah, of course. It is, however, clear that you're bad at logic.
Logically, what follows from your premises is "It is not true that X clearly did not happen", which is not even close to the invalid conclusion that you drew.
That you said this indicates the desperation of your position. Let's put it this way, just a little different from what I said before. Mueller said:
"if we had had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Then do a simple substitution. That is:
"if we had had confidence that [the President] clearly did not [commit a crime], we would have said so."
Substitute "X" for the first part in [], and "happen" for the second set in []. You then get:
"If we had had confidence that X clearly did not happen, we would have said so."
See?
In the report, Mueller did not say so that X did not happen.
That's a double negative. A double negative is a positive. This is a rule of the English language. And every other language, undoubtedly. Including logic.
Does It matter to Republicans or Trump supporters who aren't Republicans, nope. To them they think Mueller is in the Cabal with Hillary, Podesta, Obama, Comey, et. all.
Sadly, yes. Anything or anyone who doesn't support Trump will always be considered a member of the deep state.
Does It matter to Republicans or Trump supporters who aren't Republicans, nope. To them they think Mueller is in the Cabal with Hillary, Podesta, Obama, Comey, et. all.
Mueller, pulled a Comey.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
