Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He was on a fools journey with respect to finding the President guilty of a crime due to DOJ policy.
So why was he task with that by DAG Rosenstein ?
Something isn't right or someone doesn't know their job and it may be Rosenstein.
A job like the Special Counsel, in cases like that, would simply be to determine what happened. It would then be up to Congress to decide whether to seek any charges, impeach or whatever. In other words, the SC was merely supposed to be an investigator, at least when it comes to anything the president did.
So apparently he thinks the President might have committed a crime, they just can't find it.
After such an extensive investigation, do members of Congress feel they can find it? That's apparently what they are expecting to do. Boy I wonder how long they'll spend on it. Until just before the 2020 election? That should be quite interesting.
No doubt Trump will be on Twitter soon claiming exoneration again through his clouded brain.
Just get on and impeach this demented loon.
Exactly. Remember his podium? No collusion. Well from the horses mouth the President was NOT cleared and there wasn’t an option to charge him in the investigation.
So we can’t find you not guilty of the crime and we couldn’t charge you even if so.
Nancy oh Nancy, what will you do?? The screams are getting louder from your far left base who gave you the House, how much impeachment lip service can you give until you actually have to do it? I love this dance she’s trying to do, she knows history would show Dems tried impeachment with no collusion, no crime, only Mueller’s “could not reach a conclusion on obstruction of a crime that was never committed”. I hope she has enough left in the tank to navigate this for her sake, I wouldn’t want that job
You need to face reality: The only reason he was not charged with anything is because he's the president. Sadly, it appears the president can commit crimes and get away with it, just because he has a certain job.
Wrong. He was not charged because he found no evidence he committed any crime. That’s the standard we operate in Americ a
Nancy oh Nancy, what will you do?? The screams are getting louder from your far left base who gave you the House, how much impeachment lip service can you give until you actually have to do it? I love this dance she’s trying to do, she knows history would show Dems tried impeachment with no collusion, no crime, only Mueller’s “could not reach a conclusion on obstruction of a crime that was never committed”. I hope she has enough left in the tank to navigate this for her sake, I wouldn’t want that job
You are clearly underestimating her and her actions. Mueller, Amash and soon others will drop that will make her next step one with more power.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mueller: ‘If we had had confidence that’ President Trump ‘clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so’
